Also known as: legal rulings · ruling · court ruling
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A judicial determination resolving a disputed issue arising during litigation or other legal proceedings.
Lila Lin and Loyal Insurance hold their Rule 26(f) conference. Lila objects that initial disclosures are inappropriate in the action and records the objection in the proposed discovery plan. The court rules on the objection by deciding which disclosures must occur and fixing the deadline for them.
Lucy Liu offers a business record at trial. The court rules to admit the document over Leonard Lowe's objection. Leonard states the specific ground on the record at the time of the ruling so that any error affecting a substantial right can be claimed on appeal.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Layla Lane and Lumen Capital appear for a pretrial conference. The court rules in advance on the admissibility of several documents and obtains stipulations about undisputed facts to avoid unnecessary proof at trial.
Lena Lawson moves to strike an exhibit after the court rules to admit it. She states the specific ground on the record so the ruling can be reviewed for error affecting a substantial right.
Lillian Locke files a motion under Rule 12. The court rules on the motion without stating findings of fact or conclusions of law.
Linden Bank seeks to introduce expert testimony. The court rules to exclude the evidence. Linden informs the court of the substance of the excluded testimony through an offer of proof made on the record.
A party must make initial disclosures at or within 14 days after the Rule 26(f) conference unless the court sets a different time or a party objects during the conference that disclosures are inappropriate.
The party must timely object or move to strike on the record and state the specific ground unless it was apparent from the context, and the error must affect a substantial right.
The court may rule in advance on the admissibility of evidence and obtain admissions and stipulations about facts and documents to avoid unnecessary proof.
The court is not required to state findings or conclusions when ruling on a motion under Rule 12 or 56 or on any other motion unless the rules provide otherwise.
The party must inform the court of the substance of the evidence by an offer of proof unless the substance was apparent from the context.
…as it granted Dr. Hallford relief and failed to dismiss his complaint in intervention. C. The Does. In view of our ruling as to Roe's standing in her case, the issue of the Does' standing in their case has little significance. The claims they assert are essentially the same as those of Roe, and they attack the…