Also known as:assault & battery · assault and/or battery · assault · battery
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
An intentional tort and common-law crime that joins an assault (unlawful attempt or threat to cause harmful or offensive contact) with a battery (actual resulting harmful or offensive contact).
Sources & Authorities
How it applies
Common Examples
6
Battery on Relative Sparks Killing
Angela Acosta punched Alfred Ashford's brother during an argument at a family gathering. Alfred, seeing the blow, grabbed a nearby object and struck Angela fatally before any cooling period elapsed. The assault and battery on his close relative supplied adequate provocation that reduced the charge from murder to voluntary manslaughter.
Intentional Contact at Conference
Ava Adebayo snatched a plate from Anika Anand's hands at a professional luncheon and shouted that she could not be served. The assault and battery was intended to be offensive and caused Anika immediate embarrassment and distress. Anika has an assault-and-battery claim because the harmful contact resulted directly from the intended act.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Cases
Statutes
Federal Rules
Uniform Acts
Model Codes
Common Law
Restatements
Casebooks
Hornbooks
Study Supplements
Prior Assault Evidence Admitted
Aaron Adams faced trial for committing an assault and battery on a coworker. The prosecution offered testimony that Adams had committed a similar assault and battery on another employee two years earlier. The court admitted the evidence to show propensity and relevance to the charged conduct.
Old Insults Fail as Provocation
Alice Atkins insulted Aaron Adams about a business deal that had collapsed months earlier. Aaron later committed an assault and battery on Alice during a new argument. The earlier insults constituted mere words from the distant past and supplied no adequate provocation to reduce the resulting charge.
Indirect Contact Causes Harm
Aether Technologies employee Alfred Ashford yanked a chair away from Ava Adebayo as she sat down. The resulting fall fractured her hip. Liability for assault and battery attached because the harmful contact was caused by Alfred's own intentional act.
Civil Sexual Assault Propensity
Aurora Biotech sued Apollo Energy after an employee allegedly committed an assault and battery during a joint project. The plaintiff offered evidence that the same employee had committed a prior assault and battery in another workplace. The court admitted the evidence on any relevant issue in the civil action.
Common questions
Frequently Asked
5
Does a completed battery merge with the preceding assault so that both cannot be punished separately?+
Yes. When harmful or offensive contact actually occurs, the assault blends into the battery and only the battery is punishable.
Supporting sources
What intent is required for battery under the Restatement approach?+
The actor must intend to cause a harmful or offensive contact or an imminent apprehension of such contact, and the contact must result.
Supporting sources
Can a serious battery inflicted on a close relative constitute adequate provocation for voluntary manslaughter?+
Yes. At common law a serious battery on the defendant or a close relative qualifies as adequate provocation that can reduce murder to voluntary manslaughter if the other elements are met.
Supporting sources
Does mere words or a trivial battery supply adequate provocation?+
No. Mere words, trivial battery, and provocation based on distant wrongs are legally inadequate and do not reduce murder to voluntary manslaughter.
Supporting sources
Must the actor personally cause the harmful contact for battery liability?+
Yes. The harmful bodily contact must be caused by an act done by the person whose liability is in question.
Supporting sources
376 U.S. 254 (1964)Remedies
…with his arrest for loitering outside a courtroom, one of the officers who made the arrest denied that there was such an assault. On the premise that the charges in the sixth paragraph could be read as referring to him, respondent was allowed to prove that he had not participated in the events described. Although…