Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A judicial authorization for an arrest or search that satisfies constitutional and procedural requirements including a neutral magistrate's finding of probable cause and proper form such as a signature.
Sources & Authorities
How it applies
Common Examples
6
Independent Source Yields Valid Warrant
Vincent Vale's apartment was entered without a warrant during an initial unlawful search that revealed drug ledgers. Officers later obtained a separate warrant based solely on an informant's tip received weeks earlier and unrelated to the entry. They seized the ledgers pursuant to that warrant. The court admitted the evidence because the warrant rested on wholly independent information.
Plain View Requires Prior Valid Warrant
Violet Vang's car sat in plain view on her driveway for days while officers gathered probable cause for a murder investigation. They seized the vehicle without first obtaining a warrant despite ample time and advance knowledge of its location. The subsequent search at the station uncovered incriminating evidence. Because no valid warrant preceded the seizure the evidence was suppressed.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Cases
Restatements
Dictionaries
Coolidge v. New Hampshire403 U.S. 443 (1971)
Good Faith Reliance on Defective Warrant
Vera Vargas's home was searched under a warrant later found to lack probable cause because the supporting affidavit contained stale information. Officers executed the warrant in objective good faith believing it valid at the time. Evidence of financial fraud was recovered from her files. The court declined to suppress the evidence under the good-faith exception.
United States v. Leon468 U.S. 897 (1984)
Facially Valid Warrant Supports Good Faith
Vivian Velez challenged a search of her business records conducted under a warrant that appeared regular on its face. The warrant later proved technically deficient in one respect. Officers relied on it without knowledge of the defect. Evidence obtained during the search was admitted because the facially valid warrant supported their good-faith execution.
Martin v. Wilkes490 U.S. 755, 762 n.2 (1989)
Warrant Not Required for Terry Stop
Victoria Vernon was stopped on the street after an officer observed her repeatedly peering into store windows in a manner suggesting casing for burglary. The officer conducted a limited frisk for weapons without any warrant. A concealed handgun was discovered. The stop and frisk were upheld as reasonable under the circumstances even though no warrant existed.
Terry v. Ohio392 U.S. 1, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968)
Vague Statute Invalidates Warrantless Arrest
Veronica Villanueva was arrested under a statute requiring her to provide identification to police on demand. The statute supplied no standards for what identification would suffice. She was detained solely for failing to produce satisfactory papers. The arrest was held unconstitutional because the underlying statute was too vague to support a valid enforcement action.
Kolender v. Lawson461 U.S. 352, 103 S.Ct. 1855, 75 L.Ed.2d 903 (1983)
Common questions
Frequently Asked
4
What makes an arrest warrant valid under the Federal Rules?+
An arrest warrant must be signed by a judge after a finding of probable cause. It must also identify the defendant with reasonable certainty and describe the offense charged. The signature confirms that judicial review is complete before execution.
Supporting sources
Does an unsigned warrant always require suppression of evidence?+
An unsigned warrant violates the formal issuance requirement and renders the arrest unauthorized. Suppression follows when the defect is clear and the agents had notice that further review was needed. The presence of a signed summons does not cure the missing signature on the warrant itself.
Supporting sources
When does a valid warrant attenuate the taint of an earlier unlawful stop?+
A preexisting valid warrant discovered after an unlawful stop can break the causal chain for exclusionary purposes. Courts examine temporal proximity, the warrant as an intervening circumstance, and the flagrancy of the initial misconduct. When the warrant is unrelated to the stop and the officer's error is merely negligent the evidence remains admissible.
Supporting sources
What particularity requirements apply to a valid search warrant for digital evidence?+
A valid warrant must identify the place to be searched and the items to be seized with sufficient particularity. Broad language such as all digital records related to cyber activity fails this test when no specific devices or file categories are named. An unincorporated affidavit cannot cure facial deficiencies in the warrant itself.
Supporting sources
392 U.S. 1, 88 S. Ct. 1868, 20 L. Ed. 2d 889 (1968)Criminal Procedure
…Fourteenth Amendments. The Court holds, and I agree, that while the right does not depend upon possession by the officer of a valid warrant, nor upon the existence of probable cause, such activities must be reasonable under the circumstances as the officer credibly relates them in court. Since the question in this and most…