Also known as: Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A uniform statute that sets jurisdictional standards for child custody proceedings. The act assigns primary jurisdiction to the child's home state and limits modification of prior decrees to cases showing changed circumstances affecting the child's best interests.
Ulysses Ulrich and Ulrike Ulrich divorced in State X with Ulysses receiving primary custody of their son. Two years later Ulrike petitions in State Y for modification after the child visits her there. The court finds jurisdiction under the UCCJA but determines no material change in circumstances has occurred since the original decree. It therefore retains the prior custody arrangement without further inquiry into the child's current environment.
Ulysses Usher and Ursula Upton separate after living with their daughter in State A for four years. Ulysses moves with the child to State B while Ursula remains in State A. Both parents file simultaneous custody petitions. The State B court recognizes that the UCCJA grants continuing exclusive jurisdiction to State A as the original decree state and dismisses the petition to prevent conflicting orders.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
The act addressed jurisdictional competition among states that allowed parents to forum shop and relitigate custody after moving across state lines. It established uniform rules to promote cooperation and deter abductions by assigning clear priority to the home state.
Supporting sources
A court with jurisdiction under the UCCJA may modify only upon a showing of changed circumstances since the original decree that affect the child's best interests. The original custodian is presumed to remain appropriate absent such proof.
Supporting sources
The UCCJA was the original uniform act but permitted concurrent jurisdiction in some cases and led to conflicts. The UCCJEA revised it to prioritize home state jurisdiction more strictly and to align with the federal PKPA.
Supporting sources
…recognized by federal statute. See Parental Kidnaping Prevention Act of 1980, 94 Stat. 3569, 28 U. S. C. § 1738A(c)(2); see also Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act, 9 U. L. A. § 3 (1988). [^maj-39]: The Court suggests that there could be no legally effective abandonment because the parents consented to termination of their parental rights before a…