Also known as:suspects · suspected · suspecting · accused · person of interest
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A person believed by law enforcement to have committed an offense. The label attaches once officers develop reasonable suspicion or probable cause based on specific facts and permits investigative steps such as a Terry stop or arrest.
Sources & Authorities
How it applies
Common Examples
6
Sixth Amendment Counsel Claim
Simone Sanders became a suspect when officers developed probable cause she had committed robbery. At her first court appearance the judge asked whether she wanted appointed counsel. Sanders said yes. The court appointed an attorney and the prosecution could not question her further without that lawyer present.
Prosecutor Argument Restriction
Steven Silva was named a suspect in an assault investigation after witnesses identified him. During closing argument the prosecutor told the jury he personally believed Silva was guilty. Defense counsel objected. The court sustained the objection and instructed the jury to disregard the statement.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Cases
Statutes
Federal Rules
Model Codes
Restatements
Casebooks
Hornbooks
Course Outlines
Study Supplements
Sofia Stern became a suspect when officers received an anonymous but reliable tip describing her clothing and predicting her route. The tipster had accurately described her movements. Officers stopped her, patted her down, and recovered a firearm.
Consent Evidence Admission
Stephen Shaw was treated as a suspect in a sexual-assault case. He sought to introduce evidence that the complainant had previously consented to sexual activity with him. The prosecutor also offered the same evidence. The court admitted the evidence under the consent exception.
Malicious Prosecution Element
Samuel Soto was a suspect in a theft prosecution that ended in acquittal after a full trial. He then sued the complaining witness for malicious prosecution. Because the criminal proceedings had terminated in Soto's favor, the court allowed the civil claim to proceed to the remaining elements.
Prosecutor Disclosure Duty
Sean Steele became a suspect and was charged with drug possession. The prosecutor learned that a key witness had recanted but did not tell the defense. After conviction the defense discovered the recantation. The court ordered a new trial because the information had not been disclosed.
Common questions
Frequently Asked
5
When does a person become a suspect for Fourth Amendment purposes?+
A person becomes a suspect once officers develop reasonable suspicion based on specific and articulable facts that the person is involved in criminal activity. At that point officers may conduct a brief investigatory stop and, if warranted, a frisk for weapons.
Does labeling someone a suspect trigger the right to counsel?+
Labeling a person a suspect does not by itself trigger the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. The right attaches at the initiation of adversarial judicial proceedings such as indictment or arraignment, not merely upon becoming a suspect during investigation.
Can a prosecutor express a personal opinion about a suspect's guilt?+
A prosecutor may not state a personal opinion as to the guilt or innocence of the accused during trial. Such statements violate professional-conduct rules and may require curative instructions or reversal if they prejudice the jury.
What must a prosecutor disclose to a suspect's counsel?+
A prosecutor must make timely disclosure of all evidence or information known to the prosecutor that tends to negate the guilt of the accused or mitigates the offense. Failure to disclose can result in reversal of a conviction under Brady principles.
How does an acquittal affect a later malicious-prosecution claim by the former suspect?+
An acquittal satisfies the favorable-termination element of a malicious-prosecution claim. The former suspect may then proceed to prove the remaining elements of lack of probable cause and improper purpose.
376 U.S. 254 (1964)Remedies
…or to penalize it through libel judgments is to abridge or shut off discussion of the very kind most needed. This Nation, I suspect, can live in peace without libel suits based on public discussions of public affairs and public officials. But I doubt that a country can live in freedom where its people can be made to…