Also known as:strong government interest · compelling governmental interest
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A governmental objective of sufficient weight to justify a law that burdens a fundamental right or employs a suspect classification under strict scrutiny. Courts assess whether the interest is compelling and whether the means chosen are narrowly tailored to achieve it.
Sources & Authorities
How it applies
Common Examples
6
Racial Set-Aside in Federal Contracting
Simon Stern, owner of a non-minority construction firm, bids on a federal highway project but loses the subcontract portion to a minority-owned company under a fifteen-percent racial preference rule. The Department of Labor defends the rule by pointing to statistical underrepresentation of minority firms. A court must decide whether the government's interest in remedying past discrimination is strong enough to survive strict scrutiny.
Santeria Animal Sacrifice Ordinance
Samantha Stone opens a Santeria temple in Hialeah and plans ritual animal sacrifices. The city enacts an ordinance banning the precise method of slaughter used in those rituals while permitting other forms of animal killing. Stone challenges the law, forcing the city to demonstrate that its interest in public health or animal welfare is strong enough to satisfy strict scrutiny.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Cases
Casebooks
Political Patronage Dismissals
Spencer Silver, a Republican deputy sheriff, is fired after a Democratic sheriff takes office. Silver sues, claiming the dismissal violates his First Amendment rights. The new administration must show that its interest in maintaining political loyalty among employees is strong enough to justify the patronage practice under the applicable level of scrutiny.
Elrod v. Burns427 U.S. 347 (1976)
Durational Residency for Indigent Care
Sabrina Shah moves to Maricopa County and immediately seeks non-emergency medical treatment at the county hospital. The county denies coverage because she has not resided there for one year. Shah challenges the rule, requiring the county to prove that its interest in protecting the local treasury is strong enough to burden the right to travel.
Memorial Hospital v. Maricopa County415 U.S. 250 (1974)
Gender-Based Citizenship Transmission
Sofia Stern, an unwed U.S. citizen mother, seeks citizenship for her child born abroad to a non-citizen father. Immigration authorities apply a stricter physical-presence requirement to mothers than to fathers. Stern must show that the government's interest in ensuring a biological connection is not strong enough to justify the gender distinction.
Tuan Ahn Nguyen v. Immigration and Naturalization Service533 U.S. 53, 74 (2001)
Durational Residency for Divorce
Simone Sanders moves to Iowa and files for divorce after only six weeks. The state dismisses the action under a one-year residency statute. Sanders argues that Iowa's interest in ensuring genuine domicile is not strong enough to burden her right to obtain a divorce in the forum of her choice.
Sosna v. Iowa419 U.S. 393 (1975)
Common questions
Frequently Asked
4
What makes a governmental interest strong enough to justify seizing movable property without pre-seizure notice?+
Courts recognize a strong governmental interest in promptly securing movable property subject to forfeiture because it can be hidden, removed from the jurisdiction, or destroyed. When that interest exists and adequate post-seizure procedures are provided, due process permits seizure first and hearing later.
Supporting sources
Does a statistical disparity in contract awards alone establish a strong governmental interest for racial preferences?+
No. Strict scrutiny requires a strong basis in evidence of identified past discrimination in the particular industry and locality, not merely general societal discrimination or raw statistical imbalances.
Supporting sources
Can a blanket English-only rule on government property survive because of a strong interest in uniformity?+
No. When the rule burdens parents' fundamental liberty to direct the language of their children's education, the government must show the restriction is narrowly tailored to a compelling interest rather than a broad preference for uniformity.
Supporting sources
Is officer safety during a traffic stop a strong governmental interest that permits ordering passengers out of a vehicle?+
Yes. The Fourth Amendment treats the interest in officer safety during roadside encounters as strong enough to allow officers to order both drivers and passengers out of a lawfully stopped vehicle without individualized suspicion of danger.
Supporting sources
494 U.S. 872, 110 S. Ct. 1595, 108 L. Ed. 2d 876 (1990)Constitutional Law
…(1963). Under the Sherbert test, governmental actions that substantially burden a religious practice must be justified by a compelling governmental interest. See id. , at 402-403; see also Hernandez v. Commissioner , 490 U. S., at 699. Applying that test we have, on three occasions, invalidated state unemployment compensation rules that…