Also known as:religious exemptions · religious accommodation
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A constitutional or statutory allowance relieving a person or entity from complying with a neutral law of general applicability when that law substantially burdens sincere religious exercise. The allowance arises either because the law contains a system of individualized exemptions that renders it not generally applicable or because a statute such as RFRA imposes strict scrutiny on federal mandates. Once triggered, the government must demonstrate that denying the exemption serves a compelling interest and is the least restrictive means of achieving it.
Sources & Authorities· 2 primary sources
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Cases
Hornbooks
How it applies
Common Examples
6
Unemployment Benefits After Peyote Use
Roland Rhodes, a member of the Native American Church, was fired after using peyote in a religious ceremony. State unemployment officials denied his claim under a neutral criminal prohibition on controlled substances. Because the prohibition is generally applicable and does not target religion, the denial of benefits stands.
Amish Parents Seek School Exemption
Rebecca Ross and her Amish community withdraw their children after eighth grade for religiously integrated apprenticeships. The state enforces compulsory attendance until age sixteen. The community's self-sufficiency and alternative education that meets state goals entitle the parents to an exemption.
Wisconsin v. Yoder406 U.S. 205 (1972)
Church Challenges Zoning Ordinance
Rhea Reynolds's small congregation seeks to expand its building but faces a city zoning rule under a neutral historic-preservation ordinance. The ordinance contains no individualized exemption mechanism and applies generally. The church does not receive a constitutional exemption because the law is neutral and generally applicable.
City of Boerne v. Flores521 U.S. 507 (1997)
Santeria Ritual Ban Struck Down
Ronald Reed's Santeria church performs animal sacrifice as part of worship. The city enacts ordinances banning such sacrifices while permitting secular animal killings. Because the ordinances target religious conduct, the church receives an exemption under strict scrutiny.
Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. City of Hialeah508 U.S. 520, 113 S. Ct. 2217, 124 L. Ed. 2d 472 (1993)
Baker Refuses Same-Sex Wedding Cake
Rosalind Reed operates a bakery and declines to create a cake for a same-sex wedding on religious grounds. State officials investigate and express hostility toward her beliefs during the proceedings. The commission's demonstrated animus requires an exemption from the public-accommodations law.
Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission138 S. Ct. 1719 (2018)
Closely Held Corporation Seeks RFRA Relief
Riley Rivera owns a closely held corporation whose religious beliefs prohibit providing certain contraceptive coverage. Federal regulations require the coverage. Because less restrictive means exist to achieve the government's interest, the corporation receives a statutory exemption under RFRA.
Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.573 U.S. 682 (2014)
Common questions
Frequently Asked
4
When does a law's allowance of secular exemptions trigger strict scrutiny for religious claims?+
A law is not generally applicable if it permits government officials to grant individualized exemptions for secular reasons. Once that system exists, the government must justify denying a comparable religious exemption under strict scrutiny. The presence of discretionary waivers for nonreligious hardship therefore converts rational-basis review into strict scrutiny.
Supporting sources
Does Smith bar all religious exemptions from neutral criminal laws?+
Smith holds that the Free Exercise Clause does not require exemptions from neutral, generally applicable criminal prohibitions that incidentally burden religion. Absent evidence that the law targets religious practice, the state may enforce the prohibition even when it prevents a religious observance.
Supporting sources
What facts justify an exemption under the Yoder standard?+
An exemption is warranted when parents belong to a self-sufficient, law-abiding religious community whose alternative education meets the state's core interests in literacy and civic preparation. The community's long-standing practices and the sincerity of the belief that formal schooling conflicts with faith are decisive.
Supporting sources
How does RFRA differ from the constitutional rule in Smith?+
RFRA restores strict scrutiny for federal laws that substantially burden religious exercise even when the laws are neutral and generally applicable. Unlike the constitutional baseline, RFRA requires the government to show a compelling interest and least-restrictive means before denying an exemption to a closely held corporation or individual.
Supporting sources
, the inevitable effect is to impose the parents' notions of
religious
duty upon their children. Where the child is mature enough to express potentially conflicting desires, it would be an…
from the city's ordinances, concluded the court, would defeat the city's compelling interests in enforcing the prohibition. Id. , at 1487. The Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit…
.” Id. , at 848. On the thin record before it, the court declined to find, as respondents had urged, that enforcement of RLUIPA, inevitably, would compromise prison security. Ibid. On…
Constitutional LawIndividual rights · First Amendment freedomsUBEFoundational