Also known as: rational relation to a legitimate state interest · rational relationship to a legitimate governmental interest · rational basis test · rational basis review · rational basis scrutiny
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A standard of judicial review under which a classification or regulation is upheld if it bears a rational relationship to a legitimate governmental interest. The test requires only that the law be rationally related to a permissible objective and permits underinclusive or overinclusive measures.
Raymond Ramos, a fifty-one-year-old officer, challenged a state statute requiring retirement at age fifty. The department defended the rule as ensuring physical capability for patrol duties. The court upheld the statute because the age cutoff was rationally related to the legitimate interest in maintaining a fit force, even though Ramos remained physically able.
Roger Ramirez, a national of a majority-Muslim country, was denied a visa under an executive order citing national security risks to infrastructure projects. He argued the order reflected religious animus. The court sustained the order because it stated a national security purpose rationally related to the entry limits.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Rebecca Ross, a parent in a low-property-value district, challenged the state's reliance on local property taxes to fund schools. She claimed the system disadvantaged poorer districts. The court upheld the funding method because it was rationally related to the legitimate interest in preserving local control over education.
Ralph Richardson was prosecuted under a federal statute banning firearms near schools. He argued Congress lacked authority to regulate local gun possession. The court struck down the law because the prohibition was not rationally related to any legitimate interest in regulating interstate commerce.
Ruby Rivera, an operator of a reproductive health clinic, challenged state rules requiring hospital admitting privileges and surgical-center standards. She contended the rules imposed unnecessary burdens. The court held that the regulations created substantial obstacles to abortion access and therefore failed constitutional review.
Robert Rivera, a state employee over forty, sued under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act for damages after being passed over for promotion. The state asserted sovereign immunity. The court held that Congress lacked power to abrogate immunity because age classifications receive only rational basis review and the statute was not congruent and proportional to any pattern of unconstitutional discrimination.
A law satisfies the test when it is rationally related to a legitimate governmental interest. Courts defer to legislative judgments and uphold measures that are underinclusive or overinclusive so long as some rational connection exists.
Supporting sources
Yes. Age is not a suspect or quasi-suspect class, so age-based distinctions receive rational basis review. A mandatory retirement age is constitutional if rationally related to ensuring a physically capable workforce.
Supporting sources
Courts apply at most rational basis review and accord substantial deference to the political branches. An entry restriction is upheld when it states a national security purpose rationally related to the limits imposed.
Supporting sources
Yes. A classification fails rational-basis review when Congress has not identified a pattern of irrational state discrimination and the chosen remedy is not congruent and proportional to any such pattern.
Supporting sources
…the ground that "[t]he crafting and safeguarding of public morality . . . indisputably is a legitimate government interest under rational basis scrutiny"); Milner v. Apfel , 148 F. 3d 812, 814 (CA7 1998) (citing Bowers for the proposition that "[l]egislatures are permitted to legislate with regard to morality . . . rather than confined…