Also known as: private figure · private individual
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
Individuals who lack the widespread fame or voluntary involvement in public controversies that characterize public figures in defamation law. Such persons may recover damages for defamatory statements upon a showing of negligence rather than actual malice. They must still prove actual malice to obtain presumed or punitive damages.
Priya Prasad, a high school teacher in a small town, discovered that a local paper printed a false story accusing her of stealing school funds. She proved the paper acted negligently in failing to verify the tip. The court allowed her to recover actual damages without requiring proof of actual malice.
Paige Porter, a private engineer at a local firm, faced a television segment claiming she falsified safety data on a public project. She bore the burden of proving the statements false. The jury found the report untrue and awarded compensatory damages.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Pilar Pena, an accountant with no public profile, sued a magazine that wrongly reported she mishandled client taxes. She established negligence in the reporting process. Recovery of actual damages followed without any actual malice showing.
Piper Patel, owner of a neighborhood store, confronted a news report falsely linking her business to organized crime. She demonstrated the statements were false and negligently published. The court permitted compensatory damages under the applicable state standard.
Pamela Phillips, a private nurse, sued a publisher that falsely described details of her divorce proceedings. She proved negligence and actual injury. The court awarded damages limited to compensation because actual malice was absent.
Pablo Perez, a local contractor, sued a broadcaster that aired an unverified claim he committed fraud on a city project. He showed the report was false and published negligently. Actual damages were recoverable without presumed or punitive awards.
A private figure need only prove negligence on the part of the defendant. States may set the precise liability standard so long as they do not impose liability without fault. This differs from the actual malice requirement that applies to public figures.
Supporting sources
No. Private plaintiffs may not recover presumed or punitive damages unless they prove actual malice. They remain limited to compensation for actual injury when only negligence is shown.
Supporting sources
The private figure plaintiff must prove the defamatory statements are false. The common law presumption of falsity does not apply when the speech concerns matters of public concern.
Supporting sources
Private figures lack the widespread fame or voluntary participation in public controversies that marks public figures. They therefore receive greater protection and face a lower fault threshold for recovery.
Supporting sources
…for defamation.” But this does not mean that the state has no legitimate interest in providing a remedy for defamation of a private individual. We hold that, so long as they do not impose liability without fault, the States may define for themselves the appropriate standard of liability for a publisher or broadcaster of…