Also known as: persons aggrieved by an unlawful search or seizure · aggrieved person · Fourth Amendment standing
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A defendant who possesses a reasonable expectation of privacy in the place or item searched, thereby conferring standing to challenge the constitutionality of the search or seizure under the Fourth Amendment. The inquiry examines the totality of the circumstances, including ownership, control, and the nature and location of the property. Mere ownership of contraband placed in another person's container does not by itself establish the required privacy interest.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Phuong Pham placed her encrypted drive inside Paige Porter's locked backpack stored in a shared locker. Officers searched the backpack without a warrant and found the drive. Phuong moves to suppress the evidence. Because she lacked any access or control over the backpack itself, she cannot establish the privacy interest needed to challenge the search.
Paul Peterson fled a robbery and left his distinctive jacket in a washing machine at a nearby laundromat. Officers lawfully entered the premises and seized the jacket. Paul later seeks to suppress the jacket as evidence against him. Because the seizure occurred during a valid search for evidence that could aid in his identification, the jacket is admissible.
Pedro Pacheco's apartment was searched by federal narcotics agents acting without a warrant. He brings a damages action claiming the agents violated his constitutional rights. Because the agents are federal officers, Pedro may pursue a civil remedy directly under the Constitution for the unlawful search.
Pierre Poulin and his codefendant were present when officers conducted an unlawful wiretap of a shared phone line. Pierre seeks to suppress the resulting recordings at his trial. Because Fourth Amendment rights are personal, Pierre must show that the interception invaded his own privacy interest rather than relying on his codefendant's objection.
Peter Park's apartment neighbors reported smelling burning drugs and hearing movement inside. Officers knocked, announced their presence, and entered after hearing sounds consistent with evidence destruction. Peter later challenges the warrantless entry. The court must determine whether the officers' actions created the exigency that justified the search.
Peak Performance's bank records were obtained through an unlawful search of a bank officer's briefcase. The company's president seeks to suppress the records in a prosecution against him. Because the president had no reasonable expectation of privacy in the bank officer's personal briefcase, he lacks standing to challenge the seizure.
No. Fourth Amendment standing requires a reasonable expectation of privacy in the place searched, evaluated under the totality of the circumstances. Ownership of the items seized is only one factor and does not automatically confer standing when the defendant lacked control over the container.
Supporting sources
…briefcase. . . ." Id. , at 120. According to that court, "the Government affirmatively counsels its agents that the Fourth Amendment standing limitation permits them to purposefully conduct an unconstitutional search and seizure of one individual in order to obtain evidence against third parties. . . ." Id. , at 132-133. The…
…could lawfully be seized to prove crime. For just as the suppression of evidence does not in itself necessarily entitle the aggrieved person
…Congress has not done so. In its recent wiretapping and eavesdropping legislation, Congress has provided only that an "aggrieved person
…the decision below and therefore respectfully dissent. Footnotes [^maj-1]: Virginia does not dispute that Collins has Fourth Amendment standing
…there part of the time, and his child lived there. Based on these facts, Kentucky conceded in state court that respondent has Fourth Amendment standing
No. The defendant must show that the search violated his own reasonable expectation of privacy. Being adversely affected by the introduction of evidence is insufficient to confer standing.
Supporting sources
An overnight guest generally possesses a reasonable expectation of privacy in the host's home and may challenge a warrantless search. Factors such as the length of the stay, receipt of mail, and financial contributions can strengthen that expectation, though temporary arrangements may weaken it.
Supporting sources
Standing depends on the totality of the circumstances, including control, labeling of the container, and access by third parties. Mere ownership of the contraband does not confer standing when the defendant relinquished control over the bag and the area remained accessible to staff.
Supporting sources