Also known as: incident to arrest doctrine · search incident to arrest · Chimel search
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A Fourth Amendment exception permitting officers to search an arrestee and the area within immediate control without a warrant. The exception exists to protect officer safety and preserve evidence. It requires the search to be substantially contemporaneous in time and place with the arrest.
Ivy Ibarra was arrested at a rest area for suspected cargo theft. Officers handcuffed her, removed her from the rig, and had the tractor-trailer towed to a secured lot without searching the cab. Detectives conducted a thorough search of the cab the next afternoon while Ivy remained in jail. The court suppressed the evidence because the search occurred too long after the arrest and at a different location.
Ira Irving was stopped by officers who suspected he was armed. Officers conducted a limited pat-down and searched the passenger compartment of his vehicle after seeing a knife in plain view. The search remained tied to the immediate encounter and produced admissible evidence.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Idina Iverson was arrested inside her home after officers entered without knocking and announcing. Officers then searched the area within her immediate control and found contraband. The evidence was admissible because the search itself was justified by the lawful arrest even though the entry violated the knock-and-announce rule.
Ilana Isaacs was arrested under a statute requiring her to provide identification on demand. Officers searched her person incident to the arrest and found drugs. The court later held the underlying statute unconstitutionally vague, rendering the arrest invalid and the search fruits inadmissible.
Irene Ingalls was arrested for drug possession and secured in the back of a patrol car. Officers then searched the passenger compartment of her vehicle and found additional contraband. The court suppressed the evidence because the arrestee no longer had access to the vehicle.
Imran Iyer was arrested while occupying a vehicle. Officers immediately searched the passenger compartment and found evidence of a crime. The search was upheld because it occurred at the scene of the arrest and was limited to areas within the arrestee's reach.
The search must be substantially contemporaneous in time and place with the arrest. A search conducted the next day at an impound lot after the vehicle has been towed is too remote and requires a separate justification such as an inventory policy.
Supporting sources
No. A search incident to arrest requires an actual custodial arrest supported by probable cause. Issuing a citation without taking the person into custody does not trigger the exception.
Supporting sources
No. The Fourth Amendment requires only that the arrest be supported by probable cause and be constitutionally valid. A search incident to such an arrest remains lawful even if the arrest violated state procedural rules.
Supporting sources
…custodial arrests supported by probable cause.[^maj-21] The Court in Terry expressly recognized the difference between a search incident to arrest and the "limited search for weapons," 392 U. S., at 25, involved in that case. The Court stated: "[A search incident to arrest], although justified in part by the acknowledged necessity…