Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A procedural requirement that certain judicial acts occur directly before the presiding officer during formal proceedings. The requirement ensures public accountability and permits immediate judicial oversight of the action taken.
Sources & Authorities
How it applies
Common Examples
6
Jury Returns Verdict
Imani Idowu stands trial on criminal charges. After deliberations the jury files back into the courtroom and announces its unanimous guilty verdict directly to the judge while the session remains open. The announcement satisfies the requirement that the verdict be returned in the presence of the court.
Parties Consent to Jurisdiction
Imran Iyer and Ingrid Innes appear before the state tribunal in a child-support modification proceeding. Neither party nor the child resides in the state, yet both state on the record that they consent to continued jurisdiction. Their recorded consent allows the tribunal to retain authority to modify its prior order.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Cases
Statutes
Federal Rules
Uniform Acts
Model Codes
Restatements
Study Supplements
Isaac Irving sues Island Manufacturing for breach of contract. At trial the court requires the company's key engineer to testify from the witness stand rather than by remote transmission. The engineer answers questions in open court so the jury can observe demeanor and the opposing party can conduct cross-examination.
Criminal Trial Testimony
Irene Ingalls faces federal charges. The prosecution calls its first witness and the court directs that all questioning occur from the stand in open court. No statute or rule authorizes an alternative method, so the testimony proceeds under the direct observation of the judge and jury.
Public Access to Proceedings
Igor Ito, a newspaper reporter, seeks to attend a high-profile criminal hearing. The court permits the press and public to remain present while the judge rules on pretrial motions. The open proceeding allows contemporaneous reporting and public scrutiny of the judicial process.
Nebraska Press Association v. Stuart427 U.S. 539 (1976)
Government Seeks Injunction
Infinity Bank sues a former employee for breach of a secrecy agreement. The government intervenes and requests an order barring further disclosure. The court conducts the hearing in open session so that the injunction request and any resulting order are subject to public examination.
Snepp v. United States444 U.S. 507 (1980)
Common questions
Frequently Asked
3
When must a jury verdict be returned in the presence of the court?+
The jury must return its verdict to the judge while court is in session. This permits the judge to confirm unanimity and to address any immediate issues before the jury is discharged.
Supporting sources
Does testimony by contemporaneous transmission satisfy the open-court requirement?+
Only when the court finds good cause in compelling circumstances and imposes appropriate safeguards. Absent such findings, witnesses must testify from the stand in the presence of the court.
Supporting sources
May parties consent to continuing jurisdiction outside open court?+
Consent may be given either in a signed record or orally in open court. Oral consent stated before the tribunal satisfies the statutory requirement for modification jurisdiction.
Supporting sources
427 U.S. 539 (1976)Constitutional Law
…subjects: (1) the existence or contents of a confession Simants had made to law enforcement officers, which had been introduced in open court at arraignment; (2) the fact or nature of statements Simants had made to other persons; (3) the contents of a note he had written the night of the crime; (4) certain aspects of the medical…