Also known as: habeas corpus relief · habeas corpus · § 2254 · § 2255
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A judicial remedy by which a court reviews the legality of a person's detention and orders release if the detention violates the Constitution or laws. The remedy requires a meaningful opportunity to challenge the executive's authority to detain, contest factual findings, and introduce newly discovered exculpatory evidence.
Hiroshi Hasegawa, a foreign national held at a remote U.S. facility after a military designation as an enemy combatant, petitions for habeas relief. The district court grants the petition because the internal review board cannot order release or accept post-designation evidence showing misidentification. Release follows once the court determines the executive lacked authority for indefinite detention.
Harriet Hamilton, seized overseas and held without any judicial forum, seeks habeas relief in federal court. Congress had enacted a statute eliminating all access to the writ for persons in her category. The court denies the government's motion to dismiss, holding that the statute violates the Suspension Clause by providing no adequate substitute process.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Hope Howard receives a life sentence without parole for a seventh nonviolent offense and files a habeas petition alleging an Eighth Amendment violation. The federal court grants relief after finding the sentence grossly disproportionate to the crime. Howard is resentenced to a term consistent with constitutional limits.
Hassan Hakim, convicted after a capital sentencing hearing, petitions for habeas relief claiming his lawyer failed to investigate mitigating evidence. The court finds both deficient performance and prejudice under the governing standard. Hakim receives a new sentencing proceeding.
Hana Hashimoto is convicted of murder after the state required her to disprove malice. She petitions for habeas relief, arguing the instruction unconstitutionally shifted the burden of proof. The court grants the writ and orders a new trial with proper allocation of the prosecution's burden.
Harper Hill refuses to testify at a state hearing and is held in contempt. After exhausting state remedies, she petitions for habeas relief asserting a Fifth Amendment violation. The federal court grants relief, holding that the privilege against self-incrimination applies through the Fourteenth Amendment.
A meaningful substitute must permit the detainee to challenge the executive's authority to detain indefinitely, contest the factual findings underlying detention, introduce exculpatory evidence discovered after the initial proceedings, and seek release. Internal executive boards that lack these features and cannot order release do not qualify.
Supporting sources
Congress may suspend the writ only in cases of rebellion or invasion when public safety requires it. Outside those narrow circumstances, Congress cannot categorically eliminate access to the writ without providing an adequate substitute.
Supporting sources
A petitioner may obtain relief for constitutional error only if the error had a substantial and injurious effect on the verdict. The standard is less demanding for the government than the beyond-a-reasonable-doubt test applied on direct review.
Supporting sources
A state defendant remains in custody for federal habeas jurisdiction when subject to significant restraints on liberty such as probation or parole, even if not physically incarcerated.
Supporting sources
…treason, had earlier sought a decision from the Supreme Court that his was the lawful government. His application for original habeas corpus in the Supreme Court was denied because the federal courts then lacked authority to issue habeas for a prisoner held under a state court sentence. Ex parte Dorr , 3 How. 103. [^maj-46]: 7…