Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A judicial review standard requiring courts to give significant weight to the factual findings and judgments of designated decision makers such as magistrates issuing warrants or executive officials in foreign affairs and national security. The standard limits reversal to cases where the underlying determination lacks a substantial basis or reflects clear error.
Sources & Authorities
How it applies
Common Examples
6
Visa Restriction Upheld
President issues an order barring entry of construction workers from several majority-Muslim nations after intelligence reports flag sabotage risks to ports and military facilities. Alpha Framing and Nova Structures sue claiming religious animus. The district court applies great deference to the executive's national security rationale and upholds the order because it states a legitimate purpose rationally connected to the facts.
Office Petition Firing Sustained
Assistant district attorney Gerald Gibson circulates a petition complaining about transfer policies inside the office. The district attorney fires Gibson for disrupting workplace operations. A reviewing court applies great deference to the employer's assessment of internal disruption and upholds the termination because the speech concerned personnel matters rather than public concerns.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Cases
Casebooks
Hornbooks
Study Supplements
Warrant Affidavit Reviewed
Police submit an affidavit with tips from multiple informants to a magistrate who finds probable cause for a search warrant. After the search yields evidence, defendant Glenn Gross moves to suppress. The reviewing court applies great deference to the magistrate's determination and upholds the warrant because the affidavit supplied a substantial basis for the finding.
Executive Agreement Enforced
The President enters an executive agreement directing federal courts to stay pending claims by U.S. firms against a foreign sovereign. Gulfstream Aviation sues to enforce its contract claim. The court applies great deference to the executive's foreign affairs judgment and dismisses the action to preserve diplomatic relations.
Agency Rulemaking Sustained
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission adopts a rule limiting public comment periods on reactor licensing after balancing safety and efficiency. Environmental groups challenge the rule as arbitrary. The reviewing court applies great deference to the agency's procedural choices and upholds the rule because it falls within the agency's expertise.
Legislative Districting Deferred
Congress adopts an apportionment method allocating representatives among states based on total population counts. Gabriel Gonzalez challenges the method as violating one-person one-vote principles. The court applies great deference to Congress's good-faith choice and upholds the statute absent a clear constitutional violation.
Common questions
Frequently Asked
3
When does a court give great deference to a magistrate's probable cause finding?+
A reviewing court gives great deference to a magistrate's probable cause determination and will uphold the warrant if the affidavit supplies a substantial basis for concluding that probable cause existed. The deference reflects the preference for warrants and the practical reality that reasonable minds may differ on marginal affidavits.
Does great deference apply to executive actions in immigration and foreign affairs?+
Yes. Courts accord substantial deference to the political branches in immigration and foreign affairs and generally apply at most rational basis review to constitutional challenges. An order stating a national security purpose rationally related to its restrictions will be upheld even when extrinsic statements suggest improper motive.
Is great deference boundless in criminal procedure?+
No. Deference to a magistrate does not preclude inquiry into knowing or reckless falsity in the affidavit. The magistrate must also perform a neutral and detached function rather than serve as a rubber stamp.
381 U.S. 479 (1965)Constitutional Law
…must be changed from time to time and that this Court is charged with a duty to make those changes. For myself, I must with all deference reject that philosophy. The Constitution makers knew the need for change and provided for it. Amendments suggested by the people's elected representatives can be submitted to the people or…