Also known as: elements of crimes · element of a crime · elements of a crime · elements of the crime · elements of crime
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
The constituent facts that together make up a criminal offense. The prosecution must prove each one beyond a reasonable doubt to obtain a conviction.
Enzo Eastwood testified in a civil copyright suit. The plaintiff offered his five-year-old burglary conviction. The court admitted the conviction because establishing its elements required proof of unlawful entry with intent to commit a crime involving dishonesty.
Esther Eisenberg was convicted of a firearm offense. The judge increased her sentence after finding she acted with racial bias. The Supreme Court held that the bias finding was an element that a jury had to decide beyond a reasonable doubt.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Ethan Evans raised an insanity defense to a murder charge. The prosecution introduced evidence of his planning and concealment. The court required the government to prove every element, including that Evans was sane at the time of the killing.
Emma Erickson was convicted of drug distribution. The judge found additional quantities and imposed a higher sentence under the guidelines. The Supreme Court ruled that any fact increasing the statutory maximum must be treated as an element proved to a jury.
Ewan Eckhart was charged with murder. He claimed extreme emotional disturbance to reduce the offense to manslaughter. The court held that the state could require the defendant to prove the mitigating circumstance because it was not an element of the crime of murder.
Emily Ellis was prosecuted for purchasing illegal materials. She argued government agents induced the crime. The court examined whether the prosecution proved she was predisposed to commit the offense before any government contact, treating predisposition as an element negating entrapment.
The prosecution must prove every element of the offense beyond a reasonable doubt. This includes both the actus reus and mens rea components that define the particular crime.
Supporting sources
A conviction is automatically admissible for impeachment if the court can readily determine that proving its elements required a dishonest act or false statement, regardless of the punishment authorized.
Supporting sources
Any fact that increases the statutory maximum or minimum penalty must be treated as an element and proved to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt rather than found by a judge.
Supporting sources
No. Due process forbids mandatory presumptions or instructions that shift the burden of proving any element of the offense to the defendant.
Supporting sources
…Sixth Amendments, it must allege all elements of that crime; likewise, in order for a jury trial of a crime to be proper, all elements of the crime must be proved to the jury (and, under Winship , proved beyond a reasonable doubt). See J. Story, Commentaries on the Constitution §§ 928— 929, pp. 660-662, § 934, p. 664 (1833); J.…