Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A structured written summary of a judicial opinion that extracts the material facts, procedural posture, legal issue presented, holding, reasoning, and disposition.
Sources & Authorities
How it applies
Common Examples
6
Transient Jurisdiction Analysis
Cody sued King in Colorado court for malpractice arising from an Arizona matter. King was served at Denver airport during a layover. A student preparing for the personal-jurisdiction unit drafted a case brief that isolated the Supreme Court’s holding on transient jurisdiction and noted that physical presence alone satisfied due process even though the claim had no connection to Colorado.
Administrative Procedure Review
Central Dynamics challenged an agency rule that imposed new emission standards without additional public comment. A law student created a case brief that distilled the Court’s instruction limiting judicial review to the administrative record and highlighted the prohibition on courts imposing extra procedural requirements.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Cases
Statutes
Federal Rules
Uniform Acts
Model Codes
Restatements
Study Supplements
Dictionaries
Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Nat. Res. Def. Council, Inc.467 U.S. 837, 843, 104 S. Ct. 2778, 2781, 81 L. Ed. 2d 694 (1984)
Zoning Ordinance Challenge
Ambler Realty attacked a village zoning ordinance that restricted industrial development on its land. In the case brief, the student recorded the Court’s conclusion that the ordinance bore a substantial relation to public welfare and therefore survived constitutional attack under the police power.
Village of Euclid Ohio v. Ambler Realty Co.272 U.S. 365, 47 S.Ct. 114, 71 L.Ed 303 (1926)
Eminent Domain Taking
Coastal Shipping’s waterfront parcels were condemned for a municipal redevelopment plan. The case brief prepared by Cynthia Cortez captured the Court’s holding that economic development constitutes a public use under the Takings Clause even when the land is transferred to private parties.
Kelo, et al. v. City of New London545 U.S. 469, 503 (2005)
Abortion Regulation Challenge
A Texas statute criminalized most abortions. Craig Caldwell’s case brief for the litigation summarized the Court’s recognition of a constitutional right to abortion before viability and the trimester framework used to balance state interests against that right.
Roe v. Wade410 U.S. 113 (1973)
Constitutional Tort Claim
Christian Coleman alleged that federal agents conducted an unreasonable search and seizure without a warrant. The case brief noted the Court’s creation of an implied damages action against federal officers for Fourth Amendment violations when no statutory remedy exists.
Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971)
Common questions
Frequently Asked
4
What are the standard components of a case brief?+
A case brief typically includes the case name and citation, material facts, procedural history, issue, holding, reasoning, and disposition. These elements allow a reader to understand the opinion quickly and to compare it with other authorities.
Supporting sources
Why do law students prepare case briefs?+
Case briefs help students deconstruct opinions, identify rules, and prepare for class discussion or exams. The process forces careful reading and creates a concise reference for later synthesis of doctrine.
Supporting sources
How long should a case brief be?+
A case brief should be concise enough to capture the essential elements on one page or less. Lengthy quotations are unnecessary. The goal is to distill the opinion into its core components for quick reference.
Supporting sources
Can a case brief be used on the bar exam?+
Bar examiners do not expect formal case briefs. Instead, candidates must state the holding and facts of a library case and compare them to the client facts in a concise manner without lengthy quotations.
Supporting sources
410 U.S. 113 (1973)Constitutional Law
…339 F. Supp. 986, 990-991 (Kan. 1972). See Truax v. Raich , 239 U. S. 33 (1915). Indeed, we do not read the appellee's brief as really asserting anything to the contrary. The "logical nexus between the status asserted and the claim sought to be adjudicated," Flast v. Cohen , 392 U. S., at 102, and the…