Custom practice

Build the Set You Need Tonight

When you know exactly what is shaky, a generic question dump wastes the hour. Pick the concepts, pick the length, and run only what you need.

Pro

Unlock custom quizzes

As if it couldn't get any better.

Ethan L., 2L
4.9 out of 5 stars

Trusted by Law Students Nationwide

Students building a focused study set together

Verifiable to the Source

Not AI slop. Prepared by attorneys.

Step 1 · Answered

This is a real Contracts question from our bank

ContractsContract formation and modification under the UCCLaw School

Riverside Hospital sent MedPro Supplies a signed purchase order for 5,000 disposable surgical gowns. The order said nothing about indemnity or dispute resolution. MedPro mailed back its standard confirmation, repeating quantity and price but adding an indemnity clause and a requirement that disputes be arbitrated. Both are merchants. MedPro delivered the gowns, Riverside paid, and the gowns were used. Riverside later claimed a shipment was defective and filed suit in court. MedPro demanded arbitration under its confirmation form.

In Riverside's lawsuit, is a court likely to require Riverside to arbitrate its dispute with MedPro based on the arbitration clause in MedPro's confirmation form?

  • AYes, because arbitration clauses are always enforceable to promote efficient dispute resolution.
  • BYes, because additional written terms automatically become part of every sale-of-goods contract.
  • CNo, because Riverside's purchase order expressly rejected all additional boilerplate terms.
  • DNo, because the arbitration clause is an additional term that may materially alter.

Correct · D

D is correct. This transaction is a sale of goods between merchants, so the battle of the forms rules apply. Riverside's signed purchase order was the offer. MedPro's confirmation was a definite expression of acceptance. It repeated the dickered terms but added indemnity and arbitration provisions. Those are "additional terms," not part of the original offer. Between merchants, additional terms can become part of the contract only if certain conditions are met. One key limitation is that an additional term will not be incorporated if it would materially alter the contract. Clauses that change how disputes are resolved, such as mandatory arbitration provisions and broad indemnity requirements, often have significant practical and legal consequences. Courts frequently treat them as material alterations because they surprise or substantially shift risk. Here, the parties formed a contract for gowns based on the matching terms of the order and confirmation, and they performed under that contract. The arbitration clause was only a proposal for an added term. Because it is the kind of term that may materially alter the bargain, a court is unlikely to treat it as having silently become part of the contract. Riverside therefore cannot be compelled to arbitrate based solely on MedPro's boilerplate.

Rule tested

UCC § 2-207(2)

The additional terms are to be construed as proposals for addition to the contract. Between merchants such terms become part of the contract unless:

Related authority

UCC § 2-207(1)

A definite and seasonable expression of acceptance or a written confirmation which is sent within a reasonable time operates as an acceptance even though it states terms additional to or different from those offered or agreed upon, unless acceptance is expressly made conditional on assent to the additional or different terms.

UCC § 2-207(2)(b)

they materially alter it; or

UCC § 2-207(3)

Conduct by both parties which recognizes the existence of a contract is sufficient to establish a contract for sale although the writings of the parties do not otherwise establish a contract. In such case the terms of the particular contract consist of those terms on which the writings of the parties agree, together with any supplementary terms incorporated under any other provisions of this Act.

What you actually get

Every part of Custom Quizzes, in detail.

See for yourself

Build a set right here.

Choose the exam, choose the concepts, choose how many questions. This is the same builder you use inside the product — the only thing missing is your own attempt history filtering the pool.

Build a quiz the way you would in the app

Choose the exam, concepts, and length — same builder, live.

Concepts

torts iconTorts
contracts iconContracts

Per concept

5
Start 10 questions

Selection

Pick down to the individual concept, across as many courses as you want.

Walk the outline tree and check the exact concepts you want on the set — Contracts formation next to Evidence hearsay if that is what tomorrow covers. Each node shows how many questions are available before you commit, so you never build a set that comes up empty.

Filters

Target only what you have already gotten wrong.

The builder filters against your own attempt history, so a set can be nothing but questions you missed, or nothing but questions you have never seen. That is the difference between reviewing and re-reading.

Shape of the set

Set the length and the difficulty to fit the time you actually have.

Pick Law School or Bar Exam difficulty and a question count that fits the gap in your day. A focused twelve-question set before class is a real study session; a ninety-question slog you abandon is not.

How you review

Decide when explanations appear.

See the reasoning immediately after each answer while you are learning a rule, or hold everything until the end when you are simulating a graded set. Same questions, two very different exercises.

Sessions

Stop mid-set and pick it up later.

Sessions save as you go, so an interrupted set is still there when you come back, and the completed set stays reviewable afterward instead of disappearing once you close the tab.

Same standard

The same attorney-written, citation-backed questions.

A custom set is not a lesser pool. Every question carries per-option explanations, its trap tagging, and the rule it tests — and correct answers still earn study points the first time.

Build a quiz in any subject

Mix concepts from as many of these subjects as you want in a single set — a Contracts and Evidence quiz is one selection away.

Common questions

Custom Quizzes, answered

Can I build a quiz from only the questions I missed?

Yes. The AcedExams quiz builder filters against your own attempt history, so a set can be nothing but questions you got wrong before, or nothing but questions you have never seen.

Can one quiz mix multiple subjects?

Yes. You select individual concepts across as many courses as you want, so a single set can run Contracts formation next to Evidence hearsay if that is what tomorrow covers. Each concept shows how many questions are available before you commit.

Do I need Pro to build custom quizzes?

Yes, the custom quiz builder is a Pro feature. Practice questions themselves are available on the free Basic plan, capped at 25 a month.

See all FAQs →

Why trust this

How Custom Quizzes holds up

  • Draws from the same attorney-written, citation-backed question bank.
  • Filters on your own attempt history, so a set can target only what you have missed.
  • Used by law students at schools across the country
  • Used by candidates preparing for the bar exam
  • Used by attorneys who studied with it before admission
  • Recommended by practicing attorneys

We do not publish score or pass-rate claims. We have not run an outcomes study, and we will not imply results we have not measured.

Pairs with