Also known as:Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act · UCCJA
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A uniform statute that prescribes the jurisdictional standards state courts must apply when determining whether to exercise authority over child custody disputes involving parties in multiple states. The act requires recognition of custody decrees issued by other states when jurisdiction was proper under its criteria. It aims to promote uniformity, prevent conflicting orders, deter abductions, and avoid jurisdictional competition among states.
Sources & Authorities
How it applies
Common Examples
2
Modification After Changed Circumstances
Uri Underwood obtained a custody decree in State X granting him primary custody of the child. Two years later the child moved with the other parent to State Y where the child attended school and received ongoing medical care for eight months. The State Y court found jurisdiction under the act and determined that facts arising after the original decree showed a substantial change in circumstances making modification necessary to serve the child's best interests.
Simultaneous Filings in Different States
Umar Usmani and Una Ueda filed competing custody petitions on the same day after their child had lived continuously in State D for eight months with one parent. The State D court determined it possessed jurisdiction because the child satisfied the home-state requirement while the other state lacked any qualifying basis under the act's criteria. The simultaneous filings did not divest the court of authority once the statutory test was met.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Uniform Acts
Casebooks
Course Outlines
Thompson v. Thompson484 U.S. 174, 187 (1988)
Common questions
Frequently Asked
3
What are the primary bases for initial custody jurisdiction under the act?+
The act establishes four alternative bases for jurisdiction. The home-state rule applies when the child has lived in the state with a parent for at least six consecutive months immediately before the proceeding. The significant-connection test applies when no state qualifies as home state and the child and parents have a substantial connection with the state along with available evidence. Additional bases cover cases where other courts decline jurisdiction or no other state has jurisdiction under the first three paragraphs.
How does the act interact with modification of existing custody decrees?+
A court with jurisdiction under the act may not modify a prior decree unless facts arising after the decree or unknown at the time show a change in circumstances of the child or custodian and modification serves the child's best interests. The court must retain the original custodian unless the custodian agrees to modification, the child has integrated into the petitioner's family with consent, or other statutory exceptions apply.
Why was the UCCJA largely replaced by the UCCJEA?+
The UCCJA produced inconsistent interpretations and allowed multiple states to claim jurisdiction in the same case. The UCCJEA clarifies the exclusive bases for jurisdiction, strengthens enforcement mechanisms, and prioritizes the home-state rule to reduce conflicts.
490 U.S. 30 (1989)Family Law
…recognized by federal statute. See Parental Kidnaping Prevention Act of 1980, 94 Stat. 3569, 28 U. S. C. § 1738A(c)(2); see also Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act, 9 U. L. A. § 3 (1988). [^maj-39]: The Court suggests that there could be no legally effective abandonment because the parents consented to termination of their parental rights before a…