Also known as: Take Care Clause · faithful execution clause · U.S. Const. art. II, § 3
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
The constitutional duty imposed on the President to ensure that statutes enacted by Congress are implemented according to their terms rather than suspended or rewritten by executive directive.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Congress passed a statute requiring the Department of Education to impose sanctions on school districts with repeated poor test scores. President Adams directed the department to treat all districts as compliant if they submitted local improvement plans instead. Districts and parents sued, claiming the order violated the constitutional duty to execute the law as written.
Congress appropriated $300 million for next-generation air traffic control grants and directed the FAA to obligate the full amount to qualified contractors. Citing budget deficits, the President ordered the FAA to obligate only half the funds. Eligible contractors whose proposals were denied sued to compel full disbursement.
After a bridge collapse, the President directed HUD to halt all required safety audits on public projects and fast-track approvals for one favored contractor. The directive applied nationwide without case-by-case review. A competing firm sued, alleging the order substituted executive policy for statutory mandates.
The President ordered all agencies to implement a new digital identity program while ignoring statutory notice-and-comment and reporting deadlines. A civil liberties group challenged the directive as exceeding executive authority. The suit claimed the order required agencies to disregard procedural statutes Congress had enacted.
Congress appropriated funds for rural health clinics meeting objective eligibility criteria. The President directed the Patent and Trademark Office to withhold payments from any clinic whose leaders had criticized administration policy. An eligible clinic whose funding was suspended sued to compel release of the appropriated money.
The President directed agencies to condition spectrum license renewals on carriers negotiating content-moderation agreements with White House staff, bypassing statutory bidding procedures. A competing carrier sued, arguing the directive replaced congressionally mandated processes with executive preferences. The complaint alleged a violation of the duty to execute existing licensing statutes.
No. The clause requires the President to carry out statutory directions regarding appropriations and prohibits unilateral impoundment of appropriated funds. When Congress uses mandatory language directing disbursement to qualifying applicants, the executive may not substitute policy preferences or withhold funds based on political considerations.
Supporting sources
…the laws, including the power of appointment and removal of executive officers—a conclusion confirmed by his obligation to take care that the laws be faithfully executed . . . ." Id. , at 117, 163-164. In the later case of Humphrey's Executor , where it was held that Congress could circumscribe the President's power to remove members of independent…
…is to permit Congress to transfer from the President to the courts the Chief Executive's most important constitutional duty, to "take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed
…the Armed Forces, he appoints and receives ambassadors, he has the power to grant reprieves and pardons, and he has the power to take care that the laws be faithfully executed
…is rooted in another separation-of-powers concern: that
…than the Attorney General — is an "aide" and arm of the President in the execution of the President's constitutional duty to "
No. The clause obligates the President to implement the enforcement scheme Congress enacted rather than nullify it and substitute a conflicting executive policy. Categorical instructions to stop applying statutory sanctions or debarment rules exceed the limits of enforcement discretion.
Supporting sources
No. Procedural statutes that govern how agencies implement programs are part of the laws the President must cause subordinates to obey. Ordering agencies to bypass those requirements in the name of efficiency or urgency violates the duty to execute the law as written.
Supporting sources
No. A sweeping nonenforcement policy that halts enforcement of congressionally mandated rules and substitutes a new pledge-based system exceeds constitutional authority. The clause allows setting enforcement priorities but does not authorize wholesale suspension or rewriting of statutory schemes.
Supporting sources