Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A category of physical injury whose consequences are so grave or serious that they differ in kind from lesser bodily harms. It includes harms creating a substantial risk of fatal consequences, those amounting to mayhem, and those causing permanent or protracted loss of function of an important member or organ.
Sources & Authorities
How it applies
Common Examples
6
Intent to Inflict Grievous Harm
Stella Shapiro swung a metal pipe at Sean Steele's head during an argument. The blow missed but created a substantial risk of fatal injury. Under common law malice rules the intent to cause such harm satisfied the element for murder.
Self-Defense Force Limitation
Stephen Shaw faced an attacker who grabbed his arm. Shaw responded with a shove that caused only temporary discomfort. Because the shove was not intended or likely to produce serious bodily harm the force remained privileged under self-defense rules.
Trespass Exclusion Risk
Samantha Stone discovered a trespasser on her remote property. She knew that forcing the trespasser off the land would expose him to a cliff edge and serious injury. The rule barred her from using force because exclusion would create substantial danger of serious bodily harm.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Cases
Model Codes
Common Law
Restatements
Casebooks
Dictionaries
Involuntary Manslaughter Risk
Sebastian Santos left a loaded gun accessible to an untrained child. The child fired the weapon and killed a neighbor. The gross deviation created a high risk of death or serious bodily harm and supported an involuntary manslaughter charge.
Defense Against Negligent Threat
Simone Sanders confronted a negligent driver who had nearly struck her. She used a measured push to stop further contact. The push was not intended or likely to cause serious bodily harm so the privilege applied even though the threat arose from negligence.
Distinguishing Serious Harm
Synergy Systems employee Samantha Stone suffered a deep laceration requiring stitches. The injury did not create a substantial risk of death or permanent loss of function. The harm therefore fell short of serious bodily harm under the governing definition.
Common questions
Frequently Asked
3
How does serious bodily harm differ from ordinary bodily harm in self-defense analysis?+
Serious bodily harm differs in kind rather than degree. It encompasses harms that create a substantial risk of death, constitute mayhem, or cause permanent loss of function of an important organ or member. Force likely to produce such harm is generally not privileged in self-defense against lesser threats.
Supporting sources
Does an intent to inflict serious bodily harm satisfy malice aforethought at common law?+
Yes. Common law malice aforethought is satisfied by an intent to inflict grievous bodily harm. That intent alone supports a murder conviction even without an intent to kill.
Supporting sources
When does criminal negligence support involuntary manslaughter through risk of serious bodily harm?+
Criminal negligence supports involuntary manslaughter when it constitutes a gross deviation from the reasonable standard of care and creates a high risk of death or serious bodily harm. The risk level is lower than that required for depraved-heart murder.
Supporting sources
471 U.S. 1, 105 S. Ct. 1694, 85 L. Ed. 2d 1 (1985)Criminal Procedure
…and the New York City Police Department, for example, both forbid the use of firearms except when necessary to prevent death or grievous bodily harm. Id. , at 40-41; App. 83. For accreditation by the Commission on Accreditation for Law Enforcement Agencies, a department must restrict the use of deadly force to situations where "the…