Also known as:reckless disregard of the truth · recklessly disregard the truth · actual malice element
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A culpable mental state in which a speaker publishes a statement while entertaining serious doubts about its truth or with a high degree of awareness of its probable falsity.
Sources & Authorities
How it applies
Common Examples
6
Blog Accusation Against Public Figure
Rhea Reynolds, a prominent local activist, read an online post claiming she had accepted bribes. Radiance Media published the claim after its reporter received an anonymous tip and noticed inconsistencies in the tipster's account but ran the story anyway to meet a deadline. Reynolds sued for defamation. The court held that the publication occurred with reckless disregard for the truth because the editors entertained serious doubts yet proceeded without verification.
Newspaper Story on Official Conduct
Riley Rivera, a city council member, faced an article alleging he had steered contracts to a relative. The reporter relied on a single unverified source and ignored readily available public records that contradicted the claim. Rivera sued for defamation. The court required proof by clear and convincing evidence that the paper acted with reckless disregard for the truth given the obvious red flags in the source material.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Cases
Model Codes
Casebooks
Course Outlines
Study Supplements
False Light Privacy Claim
Rosalind Reed discovered a magazine photo spread that placed her in a false light by implying she endorsed a controversial product. The publisher used an old photo and added captions it knew were inaccurate after a quick internal email exchange revealed doubts. Reed brought a false light claim. The court applied the same actual malice standard and found reckless disregard for the truth because the editors published despite awareness of probable falsity.
Broadcast of Performance Clip
Roberto Reyes performed his human cannonball act at a county fair. A television station filmed and broadcast the entire performance without consent. Reyes sued for right of publicity invasion. The court examined whether the broadcast involved reckless disregard for the truth in any accompanying narration that mischaracterized the act.
Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting Co.433 U.S. 562 (1977)
Warrant Affidavit Challenge
Ronald Reed moved to suppress evidence obtained under a search warrant. The affidavit contained statements the officer knew were inaccurate after a quick records check would have revealed the error. Reed argued the officer acted with reckless disregard for the truth. The court scheduled a Franks hearing to determine whether the false statements were necessary to the probable cause finding.
Punitive Damages in Private Plaintiff Case
Ricardo Rojas, a private citizen, sued a publisher over an article accusing him of unethical business practices. The jury awarded punitive damages after finding the publisher had published without checking readily available contrary facts. The court upheld the award only because the evidence showed reckless disregard for the truth sufficient to support the punitive award.
Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.418 U.S. 323, 94 S. Ct. 2997, 41 L. Ed. 2d 789 (1974)
Common questions
Frequently Asked
4
What evidence shows reckless disregard for the truth in a defamation case?+
A plaintiff must prove the defendant entertained serious doubts about the publication's truth or possessed a high degree of awareness of its probable falsity. Mere failure to investigate or profit motive alone does not suffice. The standard requires subjective awareness of probable falsity at the time of publication.
Does reckless disregard for the truth apply outside defamation?+
Yes. The same standard governs false light invasion of privacy claims and challenges to warrant affidavits under Franks v. Delaware. It also appears in professional conduct rules prohibiting lawyers from making false statements about judicial candidates.
How does reckless disregard differ from negligence in publication cases?+
Negligence involves failure to exercise reasonable care in checking facts. Reckless disregard requires proof that the publisher subjectively doubted the truth or was highly aware of probable falsity. The higher standard protects First Amendment interests when public officials or figures are involved.
Can a warrant be invalidated for reckless disregard in an affidavit?+
Yes. If the defendant shows by a preponderance that the affiant included a false statement with reckless disregard for the truth and the statement was necessary to probable cause, the warrant is invalid. Honest mistakes by the affiant do not trigger suppression.
418 U.S. 323, 94 S. Ct. 2997, 41 L. Ed. 2d 789 (1974)Torts
…may be no more than negligence. The plaintiff may not recover punitive damages without a showing of knowledge of falsity or reckless disregard for the truth. We reverse the judgment of the Illinois Supreme Court and remand the case for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. It is so ordered. Concurring opinions Concurring…