Also known as: beyond a reasonable doubt · beyond reasonable doubt · reasonable doubt standard · BRD
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
The evidentiary standard in criminal prosecutions that requires the government to establish every element of the charged offense to a level precluding every reasonable hypothesis of innocence. In the absence of such proof the defendant is presumed innocent and must be acquitted.
Phoebe Park is charged with theft after store security footage shows her leaving with unpaid merchandise. The prosecution introduces evidence of the taking but offers no testimony or documents establishing that she intended to deprive the owner permanently. Because the intent element is not proved beyond a reasonable doubt the jury returns a verdict of not guilty.
After Pearl Porter's death her son is accused of killing her to inherit under her will. In the probate proceeding the court applies the preponderance standard to decide whether the son qualifies as a slayer and therefore forfeits his interest. A prior criminal conviction for the killing would conclusively establish the fact without requiring the civil court to apply the reasonable-doubt standard.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Paula Pierce faces a delinquency petition alleging she committed an act that would be burglary if committed by an adult. The court must find that the prosecution proved every element of the offense beyond a reasonable doubt before it may adjudicate her delinquent and impose institutional commitment.
Penelope Price sues a newspaper for defamation arising from an article accusing her of official misconduct. Because the claim is civil rather than criminal the plaintiff need only prove the elements by a preponderance of the evidence and is not required to satisfy the reasonable-doubt standard.
Pierce Patterson is sentenced to death after a capital trial. He later claims that racial disparities in sentencing statistics demonstrate that the prosecution failed to prove the aggravating factors beyond a reasonable doubt. The court evaluates whether the statistical evidence undermines the individualized finding required under the reasonable-doubt standard.
Prosperity Investments challenges a state-supported military institute's male-only admissions policy. The institute must demonstrate that its exclusionary policy is substantially related to an important governmental objective and that the justification is supported by evidence meeting constitutional standards short of the criminal reasonable-doubt requirement.
The prosecution must prove every element of the offense beyond a reasonable doubt. If any element remains unproved to that standard the defendant is presumed innocent and must be acquitted.
Supporting sources
No. Civil proceedings such as slayer-rule determinations use the preponderance standard. A prior criminal conviction obtained under the reasonable-doubt standard may conclusively establish the fact in the civil action.
Supporting sources
The Due Process Clause requires proof beyond a reasonable doubt of every fact necessary to constitute the crime charged. This rule applies to both adult and juvenile proceedings.
Supporting sources
…charged with violation of this statute enjoys ordinary criminal-law safeguards such as the requirements of an indictment and of proof beyond a reasonable doubt. These safeguards are not available to the defendant in a civil action. The judgment awarded in this casewithout the need for any proof of actual pecuniary losswas one thousand times…