Also known as: freedom of the press
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
The publishing and news-dissemination industry whose editorial judgments and reporting activities receive constitutional protection against governmental interference or compulsion.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Paige Porter submitted a FOIA request to the NLRB for internal emails about an employer. The agency released heavily redacted documents. Porter sued in federal court under state press-access law, claiming the redactions violated federal transparency standards referenced in her contract. The court must decide whether the federal question embedded in the state claim creates jurisdiction.
Pilar Pena, defense counsel in a high-profile case, told reporters that the prosecution's star witness had fabricated evidence. The state bar charged her with violating a trial-publicity rule that bars statements creating substantial prejudice. Pena argued the rule was unconstitutionally vague because its safe-harbor language failed to give clear notice. The court evaluates whether the rule's application to her out-of-court statements violates the First Amendment.
Pablo Perez, a city official, sued Pulse Media for publishing an advertisement that accused him of corruption. Perez claimed the statements were false and damaged his reputation. Pulse Media defended on the ground that the First Amendment protects publication of information about public officials absent actual malice. The court determines whether the newspaper's editorial decision receives constitutional shelter.
Portia Price, a newspaper publisher, challenged a city ordinance that restricted how many reporters could live in a single-family home near city hall. She argued the rule arbitrarily interfered with press living arrangements protected by substantive due process. The city defended the ordinance as a neutral land-use measure. The court assesses whether the liberty interest includes freedom from purposeless restraints on press household composition.
Patrick Phan, a physician and press source, challenged a state statute criminalizing most abortions after the first trimester. He contended the law violated a woman's liberty interest in deciding whether to terminate a pregnancy. The state asserted its interest in protecting potential life justified the regulation. The court weighs whether the statute impermissibly burdens a fundamental right of press informants.
Prime Logistics and its press executives challenged federal statutes capping independent expenditures in political campaigns. They argued the ceilings restricted core political speech protected by the First Amendment. The government defended the limits as necessary to prevent corruption and equalize influence. The court decides whether the expenditure restrictions survive constitutional scrutiny for the press.
Yes. A statute granting political candidates a right to equal space in a newspaper violates the freedom of the press. Government may not compel a newspaper to publish content or dictate its editorial decisions.
Supporting sources
Discipline is permissible when the statements create a substantial likelihood of materially prejudicing an adjudicative proceeding. Application of such a rule can still violate the First Amendment if the rule is unconstitutionally vague.
Supporting sources
Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of the press. This protection extends to editorial judgments and reporting activities against governmental interference.
Supporting sources
…This liberty' is not a series of isolated points pricked out in terms of the taking of property; the freedom of speech, press, and religion; the right to keep and bear arms; the freedom from unreasonable searches and seizures; and so on. It is a rational continuum which, broadly speaking, includes a freedom from…