Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A person's bodily state or an object's tangible attributes and state of repair or alteration.
Sources & Authorities· 12 primary sources
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Cases
Statutes
Federal Rules
Uniform Acts
Model Codes
Restatements
Casebooks
How it applies
Common Examples
6
Court Orders Examination
Patrick Phan sued his former employer for back injuries sustained on the job. The defense moved for an order requiring Patrick to undergo an orthopedic evaluation by a board-certified physician. The court granted the motion after finding Patrick's claimed spinal condition directly in controversy.
Hearsay Exception Applies
Piper Patel told her coworker during lunch that her knee was throbbing and swelling after slipping on a wet floor. At trial the coworker repeated the statement to prove Piper's immediate physical sensations. The court admitted the testimony under the then-existing physical condition exception.
Tenant Makes Permissible Changes
Philip Powell leased a warehouse for his logistics business. He installed additional loading docks and reinforced the concrete floor to accommodate heavier trucks. The landlord sued for unauthorized alterations, but the court held the changes were reasonably necessary for Powell's legitimate use of the premises.
Alteration Constitutes Conversion
Pamela Phillips borrowed a neighbor's vintage motorcycle for a weekend ride. She repainted it bright pink and replaced the engine with a modern unit, fundamentally changing its character. The neighbor sued for conversion, and the court held the material change in physical condition created liability.
Covenant Survives Closing
Paige Porter purchased a home from Paragon Construction under a contract promising the roof would remain leak-free for two years. After closing, leaks appeared. The court held the covenant concerning the physical condition of the property did not merge into the deed and remained enforceable.
Force Justified to Protect Property
Pearl Porter discovered intruders dismantling her storage shed. She used force to stop them after determining they would cause substantial structural damage before she could request they leave. The court found the threatened harm to the physical condition of the property justified her actions.
Common questions
Frequently Asked
6
When does a party's physical condition become 'in controversy' under Rule 35?+
A party's physical condition is in controversy when the claim or defense directly places the party's bodily state at issue, such as allegations of personal injury or disability. The rule requires good cause and notice before ordering an examination. Courts apply the standard case-by-case based on the pleadings and discovery.
Supporting sources
Does the hearsay exception for physical condition cover statements about past injuries?+
No. The exception covers only statements describing the declarant's then-existing physical condition, not statements of memory or belief offered to prove a past fact. A statement made hours or days later about how an injury occurred falls outside the exception.
May a tenant make permanent structural changes under the Restatement landlord-tenant rule?+
A tenant may make changes reasonably necessary for a reasonable use of the leased property. Permanent alterations are permissible when they are proportionate to the tenant's legitimate business or residential needs and the lease does not prohibit them.
Supporting sources
What degree of alteration triggers conversion liability under section 226?+
Liability arises when the actor intentionally destroys the chattel or so materially alters its physical condition that its identity or character changes. Minor repairs or cosmetic changes do not meet the threshold. The alteration must effectively create a different item.
Supporting sources
Why do covenants about physical condition survive merger while title covenants do not?+
Merger extinguishes contractual promises that relate to title because the deed is presumed to contain the final expression of those obligations. Covenants concerning physical condition address matters outside title and therefore remain independently enforceable after closing absent clear contrary intent.
Supporting sources
When may force be used to protect property from substantial harm?+
Force is justified when a request to desist would be useless or dangerous and substantial harm to the physical condition of the property will occur before the request can be made. The actor must reasonably believe the threatened damage is imminent and serious.
Supporting sources
, and mental health. Withrow v. Williams , 507 U. S. 680, 693–694. Under these standards, Thompkins’ statements were voluntary. The interrogation was not lengthy, the questioning was not…
and the officer's statement. In view of the jurors' suffering from the polluted air, the officer's warning that they would be locked up unless they agreed soon was both threatening and…
, and other supportive materials." 30 U. S. C. § 923 (b) (1970 ed., Supp. IV). This evidence was brought to the hearings by the Social Security Administration, whose rules the § 413 (b)…
of interrogation, the period lapsing after arrest before the statements were made, the intelligence level of the defendant, his legal sophistication, his subjective state of mind and health…