Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
2 senses
1
in professional responsibility law
A lawyer's own financial stake, relationship, or other personal concern that creates a significant risk of materially limiting the representation of a client. The presence of such an interest triggers a concurrent conflict analysis under rules governing simultaneous representation.
2
in trust and fiduciary law
A trustee's, conservator's, or fiduciary's own financial or relational stake that conflicts with duties owed to beneficiaries or protected persons. A transaction affected by such an interest is voidable by an affected beneficiary unless an exception applies.
Each sense below has its own examples, sources, and questions.
Sense 1
1
in professional responsibility law
A lawyer's own financial stake, relationship, or other personal concern that creates a significant risk of materially limiting the representation of a client. The presence of such an interest triggers a concurrent conflict analysis under rules governing simultaneous representation.
Sources & Authorities· 1 primary source
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Model Codes
Examples3
Lawyer's Family Tie Creates Conflict
Pearl Porter represents Prism Analytics in contract negotiations while her spouse serves as general counsel for the opposing party, Progressive Healthcare. The representation carries a significant risk that Pearl's personal relationship will affect her ability to advise Prism Analytics vigorously. Prism Analytics may therefore move to disqualify Pearl under the concurrent conflict rule.
Lawyer's Personal Stake Limits Representation
Pearl Porter represents Prism Analytics in contract negotiations while holding a personal financial interest in a competing firm. The representation carries a significant risk that Pearl's personal interest will affect her ability to advise Prism Analytics vigorously. Prism Analytics may therefore move to disqualify Pearl under the concurrent conflict rule.
Lawyer's Relationship Creates Conflict
Pearl Porter represents Prism Analytics while maintaining a close personal relationship with an executive of the opposing party. The representation carries a significant risk that Pearl's personal interest will affect her ability to advise Prism Analytics vigorously. Prism Analytics may therefore move to disqualify Pearl under the concurrent conflict rule.
Frequently Asked3
When does a lawyer's personal interest create a concurrent conflict requiring withdrawal or consent?+
A concurrent conflict exists when there is a significant risk that the representation will be materially limited by the lawyer's personal interest. The lawyer must reasonably believe competent representation remains possible and obtain informed consent from affected clients. Failure to address the risk can lead to disqualification.
Supporting sources
Does a personal interest always disqualify a witness to a will?+
No. An individual who is generally competent may serve as a witness even if the witness holds a personal interest under the will. The interested-witness doctrine that once invalidated devises to attesting witnesses has been abolished by statute.
Supporting sources
Sense 2
2
in trust and fiduciary law
A trustee's, conservator's, or fiduciary's own financial or relational stake that conflicts with duties owed to beneficiaries or protected persons. A transaction affected by such an interest is voidable by an affected beneficiary unless an exception applies.
Sources & Authorities· 1 primary source
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Uniform Acts
Examples3
Trustee Sells Trust Asset to Spouse
Philip Powell, trustee of a trust holding apartment buildings, directs the trust to hire his spouse's construction firm without competitive bids. The resulting contract price exceeds market rates. Beneficiaries may void the transaction because it was entered for the trustee's personal account and affected by a conflict between fiduciary and personal interests.
Trustee Retains Conflicted Asset
Philip Powell, trustee of a trust holding apartment buildings, retains an asset in which he holds a personal interest without court approval. The retention creates a conflict between fiduciary and personal interests. Beneficiaries may void the transaction because it was affected by the trustee's personal stake.
Trustee Enters Self-Dealing Transaction
Philip Powell, trustee of a trust holding apartment buildings, enters a transaction for his personal account that affects trust property. The transaction is affected by a conflict between fiduciary and personal interests. Beneficiaries may void the transaction unless an exception applies.
Frequently Asked2
What makes a trust transaction voidable because of a trustee's personal interest?+
A sale or other transaction involving trust property is voidable if entered for the trustee's personal account or otherwise affected by a conflict between fiduciary and personal interests. The transaction remains voidable unless authorized by the trust terms, approved by a court, or another statutory exception applies.
Supporting sources
Can a conservator retain assets in which the conservator holds a personal interest?+
Yes, a conservator may collect, hold, and retain assets of the estate, including assets in which the conservator has a personal interest, until the conservator determines that disposition is appropriate.
How does a personal interest affect consent in intentional-tort cases?+
Consent to an intentional invasion of personal interests must come from the person whose bodily integrity or personal data is at stake. A third party's statement or authorization cannot substitute for the right-holder's own consent when the invasion concerns that individual's personal interests.
Supporting sources
at issue have been deemed " implicit in the concept of ordered liberty.'" See Roe v. Wade, supra , at 152, quoting Palko v. Connecticut , 302 U. S. 319, 325. The
interest
that the…
interests
intertwine in respect of the ordinance, I cannot see, on the present record, how it can be concluded that “it would be difficult…
affected by the ordinance is fundamental, “strict scrutiny” is applied and the ordinance is sustained only upon a showing that the burden imposed is necessary to protect a compelling…
Constitutional LawThe nature of judicial review · Judicial review in operationUBEIntermediate