Also known as:neutral generally applicable laws · neutral law · generally applicable law · Smith doctrine
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A statutory or regulatory rule that regulates conduct without reference to religion or a protected class and applies uniformly to all persons or entities subject to its terms. Such a law triggers only rational basis review under the Free Exercise Clause or Equal Protection Clause even when it produces incidental burdens on religious practice or disparate impacts on a protected group. Disparate impact alone does not establish a constitutional violation absent proof of discriminatory purpose.
Sources & Authorities· 1 primary source
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Cases
Casebooks
Hornbooks
How it applies
Common Examples
6
Veteran Hiring Preference Disproportionately Affects Women
State personnel rules grant an absolute hiring preference to all honorably discharged veterans for civil service posts. Blake, a qualified female applicant with ten years of experience, loses a position to a lower-ranked male veteran. The preference was enacted to reward military service and contains no gender classification on its face.
Statewide Ban on Peyote Use Reaches Religious Ceremony
Oregon criminalizes the possession of peyote for any purpose. Alfred Smith and another employee of a drug rehabilitation center ingest peyote during a Native American Church ceremony and are fired. The state denies unemployment benefits because the conduct violated a generally applicable criminal prohibition.
EMPLOYMENT DIVISION, DEPARTMENT of HUMAN RESOURCES of OREGON, et al., Petitioners v. Alfred L. SMITH, et al., Respondents.494 U.S. 872, 110 S. Ct. 1595, 108 L. Ed. 2d 876 (1990)
Statutory Rape Law Applies Only to Males
California Penal Code section 261.5 makes it a crime for a male to have sexual intercourse with a female under eighteen. Michael M., a seventeen-year-old male, is prosecuted after consensual intercourse with a sixteen-year-old female. The statute contains no parallel prohibition on female conduct with underage males.
Michael M. v. Superior Court of Sonoma County450 U.S. 464, 477–479, 101 S.Ct. 1200, 1208–1209 (Stewart, J., concurring)
Public Accommodations Law Reaches Cake Shop
Colorado requires businesses open to the public to serve customers without regard to sexual orientation. Masterpiece Cakeshop refuses to create a wedding cake for a same-sex couple on the ground that doing so would violate the owner's religious beliefs. The Civil Rights Commission enforces the statute against the bakery.
Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission138 S. Ct. 1719 (2018)
School District Created for One Religious Community
New York creates a special school district whose boundaries coincide exactly with the village inhabited by members of a single religious sect. The district provides public education only to children within those boundaries. Residents of neighboring districts challenge the arrangement as a religious preference.
Board of Education of Kiryas Joel Village School District v. Grumet512 U.S. 687 (1994)
Criminal Prohibition on Same-Sex Conduct
Texas criminalizes deviate sexual intercourse between persons of the same sex. Police officers arrest John Lawrence and Tyron Garner after observing them engaging in private consensual conduct. The statute applies equally to all persons regardless of sexual orientation but reaches only same-sex activity.
Lawrence v. Texas539 U.S. 558 (2003)
Common questions
Frequently Asked
4
When is a law considered neutral and generally applicable under the Free Exercise Clause?+
A law is neutral when its text and purpose do not single out religious conduct for adverse treatment. It is generally applicable when it applies across the board to comparable secular and religious conduct without a system of individualized exemptions that disfavors religious claims. The hours rule, vaccination requirement, lease form mandate, and hard-hat rule in the exam questions each satisfied these criteria because they regulated all retail stores, hospital employees, landlords, or machinery operators without reference to religion.
What level of scrutiny applies to a neutral, generally applicable law that burdens religion?+
Rational basis review applies. The government need only show that the law is rationally related to a legitimate interest. Strict scrutiny is reserved for laws that target religion or combine a free exercise claim with another fundamental right. The MC explanations confirm that neutral rules such as the vaccination mandate and safety training requirement satisfy rational basis review even when they incidentally burden religious practice.
Does a facially neutral veteran preference violate equal protection because it disproportionately disadvantages women?+
No. Disparate impact alone does not prove discriminatory purpose. The preference is valid when enacted to reward military service rather than to disadvantage women. The Feeney primary authority and the essay model answers establish that awareness of the impact is insufficient without evidence that the legislature acted because of that impact.
May a state deny unemployment benefits to workers fired for refusing safety training that conflicts with their religion?+
Yes, when the training rule is neutral and generally applicable. The rule applies to every farmworker and addresses documented hazards. Because the requirement does not target religious conduct, the Free Exercise Clause does not compel an exemption or invalidate the denial of benefits.
Smith
, 494 U. S. 872, 879-880 (1990), we observed: "[Our] decisions have consistently held…
was directed at Cohen because of what his speech communicated—he violated the breach of the peace statute because of the offensive content of his particular message. We accordingly applied…
neutral law
subjects both men and women to criminal sanctions and thus arguably has a deterrent effect on twice as many potential violators. Even if fewer persons were prosecuted under the…
Constitutional LawIndividual rights · Equal protectionUBEFoundational