Also known as: necessarily included offence · necessarily-included offense · lesser included offense
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
An offense whose elements form a subset of those required to prove a greater offense arising from the same conduct. Conviction of the lesser offense operates as an acquittal of the greater offense under double jeopardy principles even if the lesser conviction is later vacated.
Nicole Navarro was tried for submitting a single fraudulent insurance claim package. The trier of fact found insufficient evidence for the greater fraud count but convicted her of the lesser offense of using false documents contained within the same package. After the lesser conviction was set aside on appeal for evidentiary reasons, the state attempted to retry the greater fraud charge arising from the identical submission.
Noreen Nguyen faced charges for a series of deceptive trades that generated undisclosed commissions. After jeopardy attached on the lesser self-dealing count based on those trades, prosecutors sought to pursue the greater securities fraud offense arising from the same conduct.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Nora Nash was prosecuted for felony hazardous-waste disposal. After jeopardy attached on that greater charge, the state sought to pursue the lesser illegal-dumping offense arising from the same barrel placement.
Naveen Nanda was convicted at trial solely of a lesser deceptive-advertising offense after the jury returned no verdict on the greater odometer-fraud count. The lesser conviction was later vacated for instructional error, and the state refiled the greater charge on the same mileage alterations.
Noelle North stood trial on a conspiracy count and was convicted only of the lesser unauthorized-resale offense with no verdict returned on the greater charge. After the lesser conviction was vacated, prosecutors filed a new information alleging the original conspiracy based on identical ticket resales.
Nestor Navarro was convicted of the lesser patient-neglect misdemeanor after acquittal on the greater felony neglect count arising from the same dosage error. The state later brought a homicide prosecution based on the identical medication incident and resulting death.
Conviction of the lesser included offense operates as an acquittal of the greater offense under double jeopardy principles. The bar applies even if the lesser conviction is later vacated for reasons unrelated to sufficiency on the greater charge.
Supporting sources
No. When one offense is included in another because all elements of the lesser are contained within the greater, the court may enter only one conviction. The proper remedy is to vacate the lesser included conviction and leave the greater standing.
Supporting sources
Yes. Once jeopardy attaches on the lesser included offense, the Double Jeopardy Clause bars subsequent prosecution for the greater offense arising from the same conduct because the greater requires no additional proof beyond the lesser plus one or more elements.
Supporting sources
The absence of a verdict on the greater offense constitutes an implicit acquittal. That acquittal remains effective even after the lesser conviction is vacated, barring retrial on the greater charge.
Supporting sources
…but declined to instruct on manslaughter. He submitted the robbery case to the jury on both an armed-robbery theory and on the lesser included offense of robbery by intimidation. The jury found the petitioner guilty of two counts of armed robbery and two counts of murder. At the penalty stage, which took place before the same jury,…