Also known as: joinder of offence · joinder of offences · joinder
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A procedural mechanism in criminal cases that allows a prosecutor to include multiple charges against one defendant in a single indictment or information when the offenses are of the same or similar character, based on the same act or transaction, or connected as part of a common scheme or plan.
Javier Jimenez faces separate theft counts arising from distinct store visits. The prosecutor seeks to join all counts in one indictment. The court finds the number of potential victims too large for practical joinder and requires separate trials on groups of counts.
Justin Jarvis is charged with both drug possession and a firearm offense from the same traffic stop. The prosecutor joins both offenses in a single indictment because they arise from the same act or transaction.
Jacqueline Juarez is charged with multiple counts of concealing assets after her husband transferred property with her written consent. The court treats the consented transfers as properly joined because the spouse's written joinder removes them from the augmented estate calculation.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Jonathan Jaffe faces joined counts of fraud and tax evasion arising from a land sale. The court applies its own procedural rules to the joinder question while using the law of the situs state to decide the underlying property issues.
Jennifer Jackson is charged with offenses tied to competing claims over the same funds. The court permits joinder of the claimants as defendants and requires them to interplead even though their claims lack a common origin.
Joanna Jung is charged with several related offenses. One defendant resides outside the United States. The court disregards that defendant's joinder when determining proper venue for the remaining defendants.
Rule 8(a) permits joinder when the offenses are of the same or similar character, based on the same act or transaction, or connected as part of a common scheme or plan.
Rule 14(a) authorizes the court to order separate trials of counts or grant other relief that justice requires when joinder appears to prejudice a defendant or the government.
Joinder itself does not alter double jeopardy protections. Each offense retains its separate identity for purposes of successive prosecution or punishment.
…to cross-examine the witnesses against him is a denial of the Fourteenth Amendment’s guarantee of due process of law.” [^maj-6]: Joinder of defendants is governed by Rules 8 (b) and 14 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. “The rules are designed to promote economy and efficiency and to avoid a multiplicity of trials,…