Also known as: included offenses · lesser included offense
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
An offense whose elements are entirely subsumed within those of a greater offense arising from the same conduct. Proof of the greater offense necessarily establishes every element of the included offense.
Ivy Ibarra was tried on a single fraudulent-claim count. The jury returned a guilty verdict only on the lesser false-documents charge. That verdict operated as an acquittal of the greater fraud offense even though the lesser conviction was later vacated on unrelated grounds.
Isaac Irving was acquitted of misdemeanor false-document use after jeopardy attached. Prosecutors later sought to charge him with the greater insurance-fraud felony arising from the identical claim submission. The prior acquittal on the lesser offense blocked the new prosecution.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Ivan Ivanov was tried and acquitted of felony insurance fraud. The state then attempted to prosecute him for the lesser false-document offense based on the same documents. Double jeopardy prevented the second prosecution because the lesser offense was included in the greater.
Ingrid Innes faced both a drug-trafficking charge and a related forfeiture count. After the government secured a conviction on the greater trafficking offense, the included possession element could not support a separate conviction or punishment.
Iris Irons was convicted of a greater felony and its included misdemeanor arising from one episode. The sentencing court could not impose a harsher penalty on the included offense than on the greater offense without violating proportionality principles.
Ian Iverson was offered a plea to a lesser included offense during plea negotiations. Acceptance of that plea resolved the greater charge and barred any later prosecution on the original indictment under double-jeopardy rules.
A defendant may be convicted of only one offense when one offense is included in the other because all elements of the lesser are subsumed in the greater. The court must vacate the conviction on the included offense and leave the greater conviction standing.
Supporting sources
Yes. Once jeopardy attaches on the lesser included offense, the Double Jeopardy Clause bars a subsequent prosecution for the greater offense arising from the same conduct because the greater requires no additional proof beyond the lesser plus extra elements.
Supporting sources
No. When the same conduct satisfies the elements of both offenses, the defendant may be prosecuted for each but may stand convicted of only one. The court must merge the included offense into the greater and enter only a single conviction.
Supporting sources
An offense is included when it is established by proof of the same or less than all the facts required for the greater offense, or when it consists of an attempt or solicitation to commit the greater offense. Courts examine the statutory elements rather than the facts of the particular case.
Supporting sources
…petty theft from grand theft. See, e. g., S. D. Codified Laws § 22-30A-17 (Supp. 1982). Few would dispute that a lesser included offense should not be punished more severely than the greater offense. Thus a court is justified in viewing assault with intent to murder as more serious than simple assault. See Roberts v.…