Also known as:in-camera hearing · incamera hearing · in camera · camera hearing
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A private judicial proceeding conducted outside the presence of the public and jury. Courts employ it to inspect documents or resolve disputes involving privileged or sensitive information while preserving confidentiality.
Sources & Authorities
How it applies
Common Examples
6
Refreshing Recollection Document Review
Ella reviewed her annotated printout the night before testifying about verification steps at Green Broadcast. When Robert demanded the full document under Rule 612, Green Broadcast objected that most annotations were unrelated editorial notes. The court conducted an in camera hearing to examine the printout, excised the unrelated portions, and ordered delivery of only the relevant sections to Robert.
Press Access to Sealed Materials
The New York Times sought access to government documents in a prior-restraint dispute. The district court held an in camera hearing to review the materials for national-security sensitivity. After the hearing the court released redacted versions while keeping the most sensitive portions sealed from public view.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Cases
Statutes
Federal Rules
Uniform Acts
Model Codes
Casebooks
Hornbooks
Course Outlines
Study Supplements
New York Times Co. v. United States403 U.S. 713 (1971)
Prosecutorial File Inspection
Imbler moved to discover statements the prosecutor planned to use at trial. The court ordered the government to submit the statements for an in camera hearing. The judge reviewed the materials privately, determined which portions were discoverable, and ordered limited production while preserving the rest under seal.
Imbler v. Pachtman424 U.S. 409 (1976)
Executive Documents Privilege Claim
Cheney resisted a subpoena for internal White House records. The district court scheduled an in camera hearing so the vice president could present the documents privately. After review the court ordered production of non-privileged items while protecting deliberative materials from disclosure.
Cheney v. United States District Court for the District of Columbia542 U.S. 367 (S.Ct.2004)
Presidential Tapes Review
The special prosecutor subpoenaed Oval Office recordings from President Nixon. The district court conducted an in camera hearing to inspect the tapes for relevant conversations. The judge excised unrelated portions and ordered delivery of the remainder while maintaining the excised segments under seal.
United States v. Richard M. Nixon, President of the United States418 U.S. 683, 710 (1974)
Selective Prosecution Evidence
Wayte challenged his indictment by claiming selective enforcement. The government submitted internal prosecution memoranda for an in camera hearing. The court examined the materials privately, found no evidence of improper motive, and denied the motion while keeping the documents sealed.
Wayte v. United States470 U.S. 598, 607 (1985)
Common questions
Frequently Asked
3
When must a court conduct an in camera hearing under the Federal Rules of Evidence?+
Rule 612 requires an in camera hearing when a party claims that a writing used to refresh recollection contains unrelated matter. The court must examine the document, delete unrelated portions, and order delivery of the rest to the adverse party. Similar requirements appear in Rule 412 for sexual-misconduct evidence and in several criminal-procedure rules for statements and plea agreements.
Supporting sources
What happens to materials reviewed during an in camera hearing?+
The court may order portions deleted or kept under seal. Any material excised over objection must be preserved in the record. The motion, related papers, and hearing record typically remain sealed unless the court orders otherwise.
Supporting sources
Can an in camera hearing protect attorney-client privilege during discovery disputes?+
Yes. When a party withholds documents on privilege grounds, the court may review the materials in camera to determine whether the privilege applies. This allows the judge to assess the claim without immediate public disclosure of potentially protected content.
Supporting sources
418 U.S. 683, 710 (1974)Evidence
…in confidentiality and does not implicate military, diplomatic, or other sensitive national security secrets, production for in camera inspection under protective procedures does not significantly diminish confidentiality, and an absolute privilege would conflict with the judicial function. The judicial role in criminal…