Also known as: element of the crime · elements of a crime · element of a crime · crime elements
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
The specific facts or components that the prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt to establish a defendant's guilt for a particular offense. These include the prohibited conduct, any required attendant circumstances, and any required result, along with the corresponding mental state. The legislature defines the elements when it sets out the crime, and due process requires the government to carry the burden of proof on each one.
Elijah Edwards faces federal mail fraud charges. The prosecutor calls an accounting expert who reviews ledgers and states that the spending patterns show Elijah fully intended to deprive the charity of restricted funds. The court sustains the objection because the expert may not directly opine on the mental state element that the jury alone must decide.
Eduardo Enriquez mixes a lethal substance into a drink and places it where the target will consume it, believing the mixture will cause death without any further action on his part. He is charged with attempted murder. The prosecution establishes attempt because causing death is an element of the completed crime and Eduardo acted with the purpose of producing that result.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Emma Erickson testifies in a civil copyright suit. The opposing party offers her three-year-old conviction for submitting false information in official filings. The court admits the conviction because establishing the elements of that crime required proof of a dishonest act or false statement.
Emanuel Escobar is convicted of a firearms offense. The judge finds at sentencing that the shooting caused serious bodily injury and imposes an enhanced term. The enhancement violates the rule that any fact increasing the statutory maximum must be treated as an element and submitted to the jury.
Erika Echevarria is convicted under federal drug statutes. The judge increases her sentence based on a drug quantity found by a preponderance at sentencing. The Court holds that the quantity finding must be treated as an element proved to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt.
Emily Ellis is charged with murder. She raises insanity. The trial court instructs the jury that she must prove lack of sanity. The instruction is improper because sanity is an element the prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt once the issue is raised.
An element is a fact the legislature includes in the definition of the offense that the prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt. An affirmative defense is a separate excuse or justification that the defendant may be required to prove by a preponderance.
Supporting sources
Due process requires the prosecution to prove every fact necessary to constitute the crime beyond a reasonable doubt. Facts that increase the maximum sentence are treated as elements that must be found by the jury.
Supporting sources
The rule bars an expert from stating an opinion on whether the defendant possessed a mental state that constitutes an element of the crime. The mental-state determination remains exclusively for the trier of fact.
Supporting sources
A conviction is automatically admissible when the court can readily determine that proving its elements required a dishonest act or false statement, regardless of punishment.
Supporting sources
…Sixth Amendments, it must allege all elements of that crime; likewise, in order for a jury trial of a crime to be proper, all elements of the crime must be proved to the jury (and, under Winship , proved beyond a reasonable doubt). See J. Story, Commentaries on the Constitution §§ 928— 929, pp. 660-662, § 934, p. 664 (1833); J.…