/dy-REKT ih-MEE-dee-it and ir-REP-uh-ruh-bul DAM-ij/·phrase
Also known as:direct immediate and irreparable damage · immediate and irreparable damage · irreparable damage · irreparable harm · irreparable injury
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
An equitable standard that must be satisfied to obtain temporary or preliminary injunctive relief. The standard requires a clear showing that the threatened harm will occur directly and immediately and cannot be adequately remedied by later monetary damages or other relief.
Sources & Authorities
How it applies
Common Examples
6
TRO for Forest Habitat
Pacific Clean files a verified complaint alleging that Valley Environmental will begin clear-cutting rare old-growth forest at sunrise. The complaint details permanent habitat loss that no later damages award can restore. The court grants an ex parte TRO because the verified facts establish the required showing of harm before the logger can be heard.
Injunction Against 5G Array
Blue Stack seeks an interlocutory injunction to stop Brook Cyber's rooftop installation that emits disruptive hum and lights. Residents report sleep and work interference. The court weighs the extent of threatened harm to plaintiffs against public interest in 5G and denies relief because damages can adequately address the claimed injury.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Statutes
Federal Rules
Uniform Acts
Model Codes
Restatements
Casebooks
Deadlocked Film Company
Kaitlyn and Leandro each own half of Horizon Films and deadlock the board for over a year on production strategy. The impasse empties the slate, forfeits contracts, and diverts assets. Kaitlyn petitions for dissolution because the deadlock threatens irreparable injury to the corporation that cannot await further shareholder votes.
Abortion Statute Challenge
A physician faces prosecution under a state abortion ban and seeks to enjoin enforcement. The court evaluates whether enforcement would cause direct, immediate, and irreparable damage to constitutional rights before any later remedy could restore them.
Roe v. Wade410 U.S. 113 (1973)
Private School Closure Law
A religious order operates private schools that a state law threatens to close. Parents and the order seek to enjoin the statute, arguing that enforcement would produce direct, immediate, and irreparable damage to parental liberty and educational choice that damages cannot later repair.
Pierce v. Society of the Sisters of the Holy Names of Jesus and Mary268 U.S. 510 (1925)
Public Assembly Permit Denial
A labor committee is denied permits to hold meetings in public parks. It sues to enjoin the city's policy, claiming the denial causes direct, immediate, and irreparable damage to First Amendment assembly rights that cannot be remedied after the fact.
Hague v. Committee for Industrial Organizations307 U.S. 496, 511 (1939)
Common questions
Frequently Asked
3
What must a movant show to obtain a TRO without notice under Rule 65(b)(1)(A)?+
The movant must present an affidavit or verified complaint with specific facts clearly showing that immediate and irreparable injury will occur before the adverse party can be heard. The showing must establish both the imminence and the irreparable character of the harm.
When does a corporate deadlock justify judicial dissolution under the Model Business Corporation Act?+
Dissolution is proper when directors are deadlocked, shareholders cannot break the deadlock, and the impasse threatens or causes irreparable injury to the corporation or prevents the business from operating to the shareholders' general advantage.
How does the Restatement evaluate requests for interlocutory injunctions in tort cases?+
Courts consider the extent of the threat of irreparable harm to the plaintiff if relief is denied, the consequences to the defendant, the probability of success on the merits, and the public interest.
410 U.S. 113 (1973)Constitutional Law
…principle that a court may not enjoin enforcement of a statute unless the plaintiff shows that he is immediately threatened with irreparable injury is not applicable where the plaintiff attacks the facial validity of the statute on the ground that it is unconstitutionally vague or overbroad. Pp. 129-166. (b) The constitutional…