Also known as: clear satisfactory and convincing evidence · clear and convincing evidence
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A heightened standard of proof requiring evidence that is clear, convincing, and satisfactory to the factfinder. The standard demands a firm belief or conviction that the facts are as alleged and exceeds a mere preponderance while remaining below the criminal standard of beyond a reasonable doubt.
Cameron Cruz stands trial for tampering with health records. Carla Ruiz, a victim whose chart was altered, seeks to attend proceedings before other patients testify. The defense moves to exclude her, predicting unconscious tailoring. The court denies the motion after finding no clear and convincing evidence that her testimony would be materially altered.
Catherine Carter destroyed her 2018 will after hearing a false rumor that her son had lost his professional license. She executed a new will favoring a friend. When the rumor proved untrue, the son challenges the revocation. The court finds by clear and convincing evidence that the revocation rested on a false belief about an objective fact and holds the revocation ineffective.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Caleb Chang, a city health official, sues a news outlet for reporting he ignored violations at a connected caterer. The outlet relied on a rival's tip and photos without checking records or contacting Chang. The court requires Chang to prove actual malice by clear and convincing evidence and denies summary judgment after finding reckless disregard for truth.
Claire Campbell and her adult daughter both suffered poisoning in a lab accident. Hospital records conflict on the exact timing of vital signs. The daughter is claimed to have shown signs hours after her mother's pronouncement. The probate court finds no clear and convincing evidence of 120-hour survival and deems the daughter to have predeceased.
Curtis Cannon orally directed his sister to hold farmland in trust for his nieces after his death. No writing exists. The nieces seek enforcement. The court requires clear and convincing evidence of the trust's creation and terms and denies relief when the sister's testimony alone fails to meet that standard.
Christopher Collins executed a deed transferring property to his nephew but the scrivener omitted a retained life estate Collins had clearly intended. Direct evidence and surrounding circumstances establish the mistake. The court reforms the deed after finding clear and convincing evidence of both the error and the donor's true intention.
Clear and convincing evidence requires the factfinder to reach a firm belief or conviction that the facts are as alleged. Preponderance requires only that the facts are more likely than not true. The higher standard applies in cases involving important individual interests such as parental rights termination or will revocation.
A court may exclude a victim only upon a determination by clear and convincing evidence that the victim's testimony would be materially altered by hearing other testimony. The court must also consider reasonable alternatives and state its reasons on the record.
Supporting sources
A court may reform an unambiguous donative document when clear and convincing evidence shows a mistake of fact or law affected specific terms and reveals the donor's true intention. Direct evidence contradicting the text may be considered.
Supporting sources
The creation and terms of an oral trust must be established by clear and convincing evidence. No writing is required, but the heightened standard protects against fraudulent claims.
Supporting sources
…to serve a valid public use, they would have found all the takings unconstitutional because the City had failed to adduce "clear and convincing evidence" that the economic benefits of the plan would in fact come to pass. Id. , at 144, 146, 843 A. 2d, at 587, 588 (Zarella, J., joined by Sullivan, C. J., and Katz, J., concurring in part and…