Also known as: civil procedures · civ. proc. · civil practice
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
The body of rules governing the methods and practices used in civil litigation. These rules establish the procedures for commencing actions, conducting discovery, resolving pretrial disputes, and obtaining judgments.
Cassandra Cooper's counsel produced a privileged email during document production in a contract dispute. Upon realizing the error the next day, counsel immediately notified opposing counsel and requested its return under the applicable federal rule. The court found the prompt steps sufficient to preserve the privilege.
Claire Campbell sued a Massachusetts defendant in federal court under diversity jurisdiction for personal injuries. The defendant argued that state service rules should apply instead of the federal rule on point. The court applied the federal rule because it was valid and procedural.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Charlotte Chung filed suit in state court against a corporate defendant. The defendant filed a notice of removal in the proper federal district court within thirty days, attaching all served process and pleadings as required. The court accepted the filing as properly invoking federal jurisdiction.
Craig Caldwell filed a dissolution proceeding under the uniform act. He denominated the initial filing a petition and the opposing party's filing a response. The court proceeded under those labels as required by the act's procedural provisions.
Cynthia Cortez sought class certification in a diversity action for statutory interest claims. A state statute would have barred certification, but the court applied Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23 because it was valid under the Rules Enabling Act and controlled the procedural question.
Christian Coleman obtained a dismissal of an earlier suit on statute-of-limitations grounds. In a later action the defendant asserted claim preclusion. The court determined that the prior dismissal did not operate as an adjudication on the merits for preclusion purposes under the applicable jurisdictional approach.
The motion must contain a certification that the movant conferred or attempted to confer in good faith with the opposing party. Courts examine whether the parties engaged in meaningful dialogue rather than perfunctory exchanges. Failure to document substantive efforts can result in denial of the motion.
Supporting sources
A valid federal rule on point applies even if it conflicts with state law, provided the rule is procedural and authorized by the Rules Enabling Act. Where no federal directive exists, state law applies if disregarding it would promote forum shopping.
Supporting sources
The notice must include a short and plain statement of the grounds for removal, be signed under Rule 11, and attach copies of all process, pleadings, and orders served on the defendant. It must be filed in the federal district court where the state action is pending.
Supporting sources
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23 governs class certification when it is valid under the Rules Enabling Act. It displaces conflicting state statutes that would deny certification because the rule regulates procedure without altering substantive rights.
Supporting sources
…of process shall be made in the manner prescribed by state law or that set forth in Rule 4 (d) (1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. On February 6, 1963, petitioner, a citizen of Ohio, filed her complaint in the District Court for the District of Massachusetts, claiming damages in excess of $10,000 for personal…