Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A requirement that essential elements such as contractual terms, identifications of parties or writings, or amounts of damages be shown with sufficient definiteness to allow a court to determine rights, obligations, or remedies.
Sources & Authorities
How it applies
Common Examples
6
License Terms Too Vague
Rivera Films LLC emailed StreamScape Corp offering first crack at licensing its next movie for a solid payout and suggesting they could sort out the rest later. StreamScape replied that it was on board. When Rivera later licensed the film elsewhere, StreamScape sued for breach. A court would find no enforceable contract because the essential terms of duration, territory, payment, and scope remained undefined.
Incorporated Writing Identified
Colin Chambers executed a will that referred to a separate list of personal property bequests prepared the week before. The will stated an intent to incorporate the list and described it as the inventory kept in his desk drawer. The list existed at execution and could be matched to the will's description without ambiguity.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Cases
Statutes
Federal Rules
Uniform Acts
Restatements
Casebooks
Study Supplements
Warrant Description Sufficient
Police obtained a warrant for a suspect known only as the driver of a red pickup seen fleeing the scene of a robbery. The warrant described the defendant by height, build, and the vehicle rather than a name. Officers located and arrested the correct individual based on that description.
Lost Profits Quantified
Cobalt Energy leased space from Continental Bank for a retail outlet. After the landlord breached by failing to repair the roof, Cobalt proved its lost sales through detailed monthly records and industry benchmarks for comparable stores. The court awarded damages for the proven amount of business profits.
Damages Proven from Crash
Cameron Cruz suffered a broken leg when struck by a vehicle driven by Christine Castro. At trial Cruz introduced medical bills, wage statements, and expert testimony projecting future treatment costs. The jury awarded compensatory damages matching the documented extent of harm.
Identification Free of Taint
A witness viewed a lineup after an earlier unconstitutional show-up. The witness had seen the robber clearly under streetlights for thirty seconds during the crime and gave a matching description before the show-up. The in-court identification was admitted because it rested on an independent source.
Common questions
Frequently Asked
4
How does the certainty requirement affect contract formation?+
A manifestation of intention cannot be accepted to form a contract unless the terms are reasonably certain. Terms are reasonably certain only if they supply a basis for determining breach and an appropriate remedy. Vague statements that leave essential elements such as quantity, price, duration, or scope undefined prevent formation even when the parties intend to deal.
Supporting sources
What level of proof satisfies the certainty rule for damages?+
A plaintiff must establish the extent of harm and the amount of compensation with as much certainty as the nature of the claim and circumstances permit. In business contexts this often requires evidence of lost profits shown to a reasonable degree of certainty through records or reliable projections.
Supporting sources
When may extrinsic evidence help satisfy the certainty requirement?+
Extrinsic evidence may be admitted to determine whether separate writings were intended as a single will or to clarify identification of a beneficiary or writing. The evidence must still show that the essential terms or identity can be ascertained with reasonable certainty from the documents and surrounding facts.
Supporting sources
Does the certainty standard apply to arrest warrants?+
A warrant must contain the defendant's name or a description by which the defendant can be identified with reasonable certainty. A description that allows officers to locate the correct individual satisfies the rule even when the true name is unknown.
Supporting sources
545 U.S. 469, 503 (2005)Property
…of public use.[^maj-19] Alternatively, petitioners maintain that for takings of this kind we should require a "reasonable certainty" that the expected public benefits will actually accrue. Such a rule, however, would represent an even greater departure from our precedent. "When the legislature's purpose is legitimate…