/ad-VISE and kun-SENT of the SEN-it/·constitutional clause
Also known as:advice and consent · Senate confirmation · senatorial advice and consent
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
The constitutional requirement that the President obtain Senate approval before making treaties or appointing principal officers of the United States. The Senate must concur by a two-thirds vote for treaties and by majority vote for appointments of ambassadors, Supreme Court justices, and other officers whose appointments are not vested elsewhere by law.
Sources & Authorities
How it applies
Common Examples
6
Treaty on Manufacturing Quotas
President Turkey negotiated a manufacturing compact with China that imposed binding production quotas on U.S. factories and export limits. He implemented the compact by executive order without Senate review. Sun Assembly challenged the compact in federal court, arguing that the agreement's formal execution and long-term domestic effects required Senate approval under the Treaty Clause.
Judicial Appointment of Investigator
A judicial panel appointed Ronald as a special investigator with authority limited to reviewing one official's handling of specific disciplinary files and issuing recommendations. The appointment occurred during a Senate deadlock over a permanent replacement. Nelson challenged the appointment, claiming the role required presidential nomination and Senate confirmation.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Cases
Statutes
Casebooks
State Judicial Selection Rules
Minnesota adopted rules restricting judicial candidates from announcing their views on disputed legal issues during elections. The rules were challenged as violating the First Amendment. The Supreme Court analyzed whether the state's choice to elect judges rather than rely on presidential nomination and Senate confirmation altered the constitutional structure for selecting judges.
Republican Party of Minnesota v. White536 U.S. 765, 122 S.Ct. 2528, 153 L.Ed.2d 694 (2002)
Executive Agreement on Trade
The President negotiated an agreement with foreign nations limiting exports of arms without submitting it to the Senate. Curtiss-Wright challenged enforcement of the agreement. The Court examined the President's authority to conduct foreign affairs through agreements that did not receive formal Senate advice and consent.
United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp.299 U.S. 304 (1936)
Federal Election Commission Members
Congress created the Federal Election Commission and provided for appointment of its members by congressional leaders rather than by the President. Buckley challenged the constitutionality of the appointment method. The Court held that members exercising executive power must be appointed by the President with Senate advice and consent.
Buckley v. Valeo424 U.S. 1, 93 (1976)
Commission for Judicial Appointee
President Adams signed a commission for Marbury as a justice of the peace but the commission was never delivered. Marbury sought a writ of mandamus to compel delivery. The Court addressed whether Senate confirmation of the appointment created a vested right that the executive branch could not unilaterally withhold.
Marbury v. Madison5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137 (1803)
Common questions
Frequently Asked
3
When does an agreement with a foreign power require Senate advice and consent?+
An agreement requires Senate advice and consent when it functions as a treaty by creating binding long-term obligations on domestic parties and receiving formal execution with a foreign sovereign. Temporary executive agreements addressing urgent crises may proceed without Senate approval.
Supporting sources
What factors determine whether an officer is inferior and therefore exempt from Senate confirmation?+
An officer is inferior when duties are limited to a narrow range of persons and subjects, the role is temporary or recommendatory, and the position lacks broad policymaking authority. Such officers may be appointed by courts or department heads rather than through presidential nomination and Senate confirmation.
Supporting sources
Does the Appointments Clause permit courts to appoint special investigators or prosecutors?+
Courts may appoint such officials when Congress has classified the position as inferior because of its limited jurisdiction and duties. The Constitution expressly allows Congress to vest appointment of inferior officers in the courts of law.
Supporting sources
424 U.S. 1 (1976)Legislation and Regulation
…§ 2, cl. 2. The Commission is empowered to exercise executive power, and its members must be appointed by the President with the advice and consent of the Senate. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed in part and reversed in part, and the case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. Concurring opinions…