Also known as: vadimony · recognizance · surety · appearance bond
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A guarantee in Roman law that a litigant would appear in court. The guarantee was originally backed by sureties and could take the form of a solemn promise to that effect.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
In a Roman contract dispute, litigant Viola Volkov posted a vadimonium backed by sureties. When the opposing party sought production of notes prepared by her advocate analyzing the vadimonium's enforceability, the praetor applied the advocate-work-product rule to deny discovery absent a showing of substantial need.
Litigant Vivian Velez posted a vadimonium backed by sureties to guarantee her presence at a hearing before the praetor. After she failed to appear, the court invoked the suretyship rule to determine whether penalties could be imposed on the sureties without conflicting with the original undertaking.
Nonresident Violet Vidal posted a vadimonium to appear in an insurance coverage action in Rome. The praetor assessed whether her contacts with the forum satisfied the jurisdictional standard when determining personal jurisdiction over the surety.
Vanessa Vega posted a vadimonium to secure her testimony in a challenge to restrictions on religious rites. The court considered the vadimonium's validity while evaluating the underlying claims under Roman substantive law.
Virgil Volpe posted a vadimonium supported by a female surety in a traffic matter. The praetor evaluated whether the state's gender-based rule for approving sureties survived scrutiny under the applicable Roman standard.
Victor Vargas posted a vadimonium to appear in a proceeding concerning his child's status. The court examined whether the vadimonium affected his opportunity to be heard, applying the due-process analysis of Roman family law to the parental-rights claim.
A vadimonium served to guarantee that a litigant would appear in court. It was originally backed by sureties who could be called upon if the litigant failed to appear.
Supporting sources
A vadimonium was a solemn promise or guarantee rooted in Roman procedure. Modern bonds often involve cash or corporate sureties, whereas the vadimonium emphasized personal sureties and a formal undertaking to appear.
Supporting sources
Yes. Because the guarantee was originally backed by sureties, a court could proceed directly against the surety if the principal litigant failed to appear as promised.
Supporting sources
…history of the Fourteenth Amendment in its reliance on the "compelling state interest" test. See Weber v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. , 406 U. S. 164, 179 (1972) (dissenting opinion). But the Court adds a new wrinkle to this test by transposing it from the legal considerations associated with the Equal Protection…