Also known as: universal malices · implied malice
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A culpable mental state consisting of extreme recklessness toward human life in general. The actor forms an intent to kill on slight provocation while remaining indifferent to the identity of any particular victim. This state supplies implied malice for common-law murder even without a formed purpose to kill or injure a specific person.
Grant ordered unstable chemical drums lashed to the open deck of a cargo ship despite a severe storm forecast. When the storm arrived the drums exploded and killed a deckhand. The captain's decision to expose multiple crew members to the known risk of explosion without regard to any one person's safety demonstrated universal malice sufficient for murder.
Joe pumped hazardous waste into a storm channel at night knowing fumes could kill anyone nearby. A homeless man sleeping in the channel inhaled concentrated fumes and died. Joe's willingness to create a lethal risk to any person in the area without caring which victim might die established universal malice.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Aidan locked Alfred inside a conference room and repeatedly struck him in the head with a heavy stapler until Alfred lost consciousness. Alfred later died from brain hemorrhage. Aidan's attack formed on slight provocation and showed indifference to whether the victim lived or died, supplying universal malice.
A defendant killed his wife after she admitted an affair and then claimed the killing occurred in sudden heat of passion. The prosecution proved the defendant had previously threatened to kill any man who approached her. The prior threats showed a formed intent to kill on slight provocation without regard to the specific victim, establishing universal malice.
Two men entered a business to commit robbery and bound the employees. During the robbery one employee suffered a fatal heart attack after the defendants fired warning shots into the ceiling. Their readiness to kill any person present on slight resistance demonstrated universal malice that converted the death into murder.
A man fired several shots into a crowded street after an argument with one person. A bystander who had no connection to the dispute was struck and killed. The shooter's willingness to endanger multiple lives without caring which person died established the universal malice required for murder.
Universal malice requires indifference to human life generally rather than risk to one identified victim. Some jurisdictions limit depraved-heart murder to cases in which multiple persons are endangered. An attack on a single victim may then support only manslaughter.
Supporting sources
No. The doctrine is satisfied when the defendant forms an intent to kill on slight provocation while remaining indifferent to the identity of the eventual victim. The focus is the actor's disregard for any particular life rather than a plan to kill multiple victims.
Supporting sources
Yes. Prior threats or planning that show a settled willingness to kill on slight provocation can rebut a heat-of-passion defense even if the fatal act occurred during an argument. The earlier statements demonstrate that the malice was not formed in the sudden moment of provocation.
Supporting sources
…either express or implied." Manslaughter was a killing "in the heat of passion, on sudden provocation, without express or implied malice aforethought." Id. , at 686, and n. 3. Although "express malice" at one point may have had its own significant independent meaning, see Perkins, A Re-Examination of Malice Aforethought, 43…