Also known as:undue hardship defence · undue hardship defenses · undue hardship defences · undue hardship
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
2 senses
1
in civil procedure
A showing that a party has substantial need for materials prepared in anticipation of litigation and cannot obtain their substantial equivalent by other means without undue hardship. This showing overcomes qualified work product protection and permits discovery of fact work product while opinion work product remains shielded.
2
in nuisance law
A factor establishing that an intentional invasion of another's interest in the use and enjoyment of land is unreasonable when the harm is significant and the actor could avoid the harm in whole or in part without undue hardship.
Each sense below has its own examples, sources, and questions.
Sense 1
1
in civil procedure
A showing that a party has substantial need for materials prepared in anticipation of litigation and cannot obtain their substantial equivalent by other means without undue hardship. This showing overcomes qualified work product protection and permits discovery of fact work product while opinion work product remains shielded.
Sources & Authorities· 2 primary sources
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Cases
Federal Rules
Examples4
Warehouse Fire Claims File Dispute
Lakeside Warehousing sued Harbor Mutual after a fire. Harbor Mutual's adjuster notes and investigator reports were prepared after the insurer anticipated denying coverage. Lakeside moved to compel. The court required Lakeside to demonstrate substantial need for the materials and that it could not obtain equivalent information through depositions or its own investigation without undue hardship before ordering production of fact work product.
Corporate Spill Interview Notes
Vincent and crew members sued Coastal Marine after a chemical spill. Maritime counsel interviewed crew and dock workers days later and prepared notes. The plaintiffs sought the notes in discovery. The court held that the notes qualified as work product and denied production absent a showing of substantial need and inability to obtain the information without undue hardship through other means.
Pre-Enforcement Challenge Discovery
Uliana Ustinova's advocacy group faced potential enforcement of a statute. In related discovery, the group sought internal agency preparation materials. The court applied the undue hardship defense standard and required the group to show substantial need and inability to obtain equivalent information without undue hardship before compelling production of work product.
Frequently Asked4
What must a party show to overcome work product protection under the undue hardship defense?+
The party must demonstrate substantial need for the materials to prepare its case and that it cannot obtain their substantial equivalent by other means without undue hardship. Even if that showing succeeds, the court must still protect opinion work product containing mental impressions and legal theories.
Supporting sources
Does the undue hardship defense apply only to materials created by attorneys?+
No. The defense applies to materials prepared by or for a party or its representatives in anticipation of litigation. Engineering teams, claims adjusters, and other non-attorney representatives can create protected work product that requires the same substantial need and undue hardship showing.
Supporting sources
Sense 2
2
in nuisance law
A factor establishing that an intentional invasion of another's interest in the use and enjoyment of land is unreasonable when the harm is significant and the actor could avoid the harm in whole or in part without undue hardship.
Sources & Authorities· 1 source
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Restatements
Examples1
Cement Plant Dust Emissions
Ulf Ulfsson operated a cement plant whose dust emissions substantially interfered with neighboring properties. The neighbors proved the harm was significant. Ulf could have installed feasible controls to reduce emissions without undue hardship to the plant's operations. The court therefore found the invasion unreasonable and granted injunctive relief.
Frequently Asked1
When is an intentional invasion of land use unreasonable under the undue hardship defense?+
The invasion is unreasonable if the resulting harm is significant and the actor could avoid the harm in whole or in part without undue hardship. This factor is weighed with the gravity of the harm and the utility of the conduct.
Umar Usmani sued Universal Motors after a product failure. The company withheld engineering notes prepared after it anticipated litigation. Umar moved to compel. The court required Umar to establish substantial need for the notes and that equivalent information could not be obtained without undue hardship before ordering any production.
How does the undue hardship defense interact with the attorney-client privilege in corporate settings?+
The privilege protects communications between corporate counsel and employees at all levels when made at the direction of superiors for the purpose of securing legal advice. The undue hardship defense addresses only work product and does not overcome privilege protection.
Supporting sources
What happens if a party shows substantial need but the materials contain opinion work product?+
The court may order production of fact work product but must protect against disclosure of mental impressions, conclusions, opinions, and legal theories. Redaction or in camera review is typically used to shield opinion content even when the undue hardship showing is met.
Supporting sources
upon the developer of the property.[^maj-1] In addition, the statute’s negative criteria must be satisfied, that is that the variance can be granted “without substantial detriment to the…
." Restatement (Second) of Torts, supra at § 830. "The question is not whether the activity itself is an improper, unsuitable or illegal thing to do in the place where it is being…
on plaintiffs in the pursuit of meritorious claims.” According to the Tinchers, the Third Restatement shifts the emphasis from the existing product to speculation of what similar product…
on the employee, and is not injurious to the public." Solari Indus. v. Malady , 55 N.J. 571, 576, 264 A.2d 53 (1970). We also held in Solari that if such a covenant is found to be…
Family LawSeparation, divorce, dissolution, and annulment · Child supportUBEIntermediate