Also known as:taints · tainted · tainting · tainted evidence
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
in criminal procedure
A connection between evidence and an unconstitutional search, arrest, or interrogation that renders the evidence subject to exclusion under the fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine. The connection dissipates when intervening circumstances, the passage of time, or the absence of flagrant police misconduct purge the taint, allowing admission of the evidence despite its indirect derivation from the illegality.
Sources & Authorities· 6 primary sources
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Cases
Restatements
Casebooks
Hornbooks
Course Outlines
Study Supplements
How it applies
Common Examples
6
Negligent Stop and Outstanding Warrant
Officer Ramirez stopped Tyrone Tran on a hunch without reasonable suspicion and learned of an unrelated valid arrest warrant minutes later. The officer arrested Tran on the warrant and found drugs during a search incident to arrest. The court admitted the drugs because the warrant's discovery constituted an intervening circumstance that attenuated any taint from the initial stop.
Unlawful Stop and Preexisting Warrant
Police stopped Tabitha Taylor without reasonable suspicion and discovered an outstanding arrest warrant from another jurisdiction during the encounter. Officers arrested Taylor on the warrant and recovered narcotics from her person. The court held the warrant's discovery and the officer's merely negligent conduct attenuated the taint, rendering the drugs admissible.
Illegal Arrest and Later Confession
Officers arrested Theodore Tucker without probable cause and obtained a statement from him hours later at the station. Tucker later returned voluntarily and gave a second statement after receiving Miranda warnings. The court admitted the second statement because the voluntary return and the passage of time sufficiently attenuated the taint of the unlawful arrest.
Tainted Lineup and In-Court Identification
Police conducted a suggestive lineup without counsel for Tiffany Torres, who was later identified by the victim. At trial the victim identified Torres again. The court permitted the in-court identification after finding the victim's extended opportunity to view the perpetrator at the crime scene and the accuracy of her prior description purged the taint of the improper lineup.
Compelled Testimony and Independent Evidence
Tamara Tan received use immunity and testified before a grand jury about corporate records. Prosecutors later introduced the same records obtained from a separate subpoena issued before her testimony. The court admitted the records because the government proved an independent source wholly unconnected to the compelled testimony.
Kastigar v. United States406 U.S. 441 (1972)
Campaign Expenditure and Later Ruling
Titan Industries made independent expenditures supporting a candidate. A later decision addressed whether those expenditures could taint subsequent judicial rulings involving the same candidate. The court evaluated the expenditures under independent constitutional standards without treating them as automatically disqualifying the later proceeding.
Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission558 U.S. 310, 352 (2010)
Common questions
Frequently Asked
4
What factors determine whether the taint of an illegal stop has been purged?+
Courts weigh the temporal proximity between the illegality and the discovery of evidence, the presence of intervening circumstances such as a valid arrest warrant, and the flagrancy of the police misconduct. When the officer's conduct is merely negligent and a preexisting warrant supplies an independent basis for arrest, the taint is ordinarily attenuated.
Supporting sources
Does an unlawful arrest automatically taint a later voluntary confession?+
No. A subsequent confession may be admissible if the connection to the illegal arrest has become sufficiently attenuated through the passage of time, intervening events, or the defendant's voluntary return to the station. The prosecution must show the evidence was not obtained by exploitation of the primary illegality.
When is an in-court identification admissible despite a tainted pretrial lineup?+
The prosecution may introduce the identification if it establishes by clear and convincing evidence an independent source based on the witness's opportunity to observe the perpetrator, degree of attention, accuracy of prior description, level of certainty, and time between the crime and confrontation.
Supporting sources
How does the exclusionary rule balance deterrence against social costs when evidence is tainted?+
Suppression is not automatic. Courts consider the culpability of the police conduct and whether exclusion would meaningfully deter future violations. Isolated or negligent misconduct ordinarily does not justify suppression when the deterrent value is low relative to the cost of excluding reliable evidence.
Supporting sources
the decisions that the officeholder thereafter takes. Caperton is illuminating in several additional respects. It underscores the old insight that, on account of the extreme difficulty…
by content discrimination.” Id. , at 315. Under a proper application of the relevant standards, the ordinance is clearly unconstitutional. A The Court finds that the ordinance was…
by fraud, or coercion, or conduct otherwise prohibited by law.[^maj-10] Id. , p. 258. But it is evident that in its widest range, "unfair competition," as it has been understood in the…
tainted evidence
will in fact slip through that net. In my view the Court turns reason on its head…
Criminal Law & ProcedureConstitutional protection of accused persons · Fair trial and guilty pleasUBEFoundational