Also known as:rights to possess · right of possession · possessory right
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A core incident of property ownership consisting of the legal entitlement to control and occupy property to the exclusion of others. This right forms part of the bundle of rights inhering in ownership and determines superior claims in disputes over land or chattels.
Sources & Authorities
How it applies
Common Examples
6
Mortgagor Retains Rents
Riverstone Manufacturing holds a mortgage on a commercial building owned by Redwood Bank. Without consent, Redwood Bank diverts rental payments from tenants into its own accounts instead of applying them to maintenance or taxes. The mortgagee asserts its right to possess those rents under the mortgage terms, triggering a claim for waste.
Lawful Possession Converted
Raphael Rivera, a warehouse supervisor, lawfully receives electronics shipments for his employer. He later diverts several crates to a private buyer while still holding authority over the cargo. The employer claims the initial lawful possession distinguishes the conduct from a trespassory taking.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Cases
Statutes
Uniform Acts
Common Law
Restatements
Casebooks
Penn Central Transportation Co. owns Grand Central Terminal. City regulations prevent alteration of the building's exterior, restricting the owner's ability to develop air rights above the structure. The owner asserts that the restrictions impair its right to possess and use the property as it chooses.
Penn Central Transportation Co. et al. v. New York City438 U.S. 104, 98 S.Ct. 2646, 57 L.Ed.2d 631 (1978)
Cable Installation Occupies Space
Loretto owns an apartment building. A cable company installs equipment on the roof and exterior walls under a city ordinance without the owner's consent. The owner claims the permanent physical occupation destroys the right to possess and exclude others from that portion of the property.
Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.458 U.S. 419, 427 (1982)
Eminent Domain Challenge
Roberto Reyes owns commercial property targeted for redevelopment. The city initiates eminent domain proceedings claiming a public purpose. Reyes asserts that the taking would improperly divest his right to possess the land without adequate justification under state constitutional standards.
City of Norwood v. Horney853 N.E.2d 1115 (Ohio 2006)
Inter Vivos Gift of Painting
Ronald Reed's father executes a document transferring title to a valuable painting while reserving a life estate. The father retains physical possession until death. Upon the father's passing, Ronald Reed claims the right to possess the painting as the remainder interest holder against the stepmother's refusal to surrender it.
Gruen v. Gruen496 N.E.2d 869
Common questions
Frequently Asked
4
How does the right to possess differ from mere custody in embezzlement cases?+
The right to possess establishes lawful control that permits conversion without an initial trespass, distinguishing embezzlement from larceny. A person holding this right may misappropriate property while still in lawful possession.
Supporting sources
When may force be used to regain the right to possess property?+
Force may be justified when the actor reasonably believes immediate reentry is necessary after unlawful dispossession and the opposing party lacks a superior claim of right. For land, exceptional hardship from delay must also be shown under the Model Penal Code approach.
Supporting sources
Does a permanent physical occupation destroy the right to possess?+
Yes. Permanent occupation by another eliminates the owner's power to possess the occupied space and to exclude the occupier, destroying that strand of the property rights bundle.
Supporting sources
What role does the right to possess play in mortgage waste claims?+
The mortgagee holds a right to possess rents generated by the property. When the mortgagor retains those rents without consent, the retention constitutes waste impairing the mortgagee's security interest.
Supporting sources
438 U.S. 104, 98 S.Ct. 2646, 57 L.Ed.2d 631 (1978)Property
…by law. [Instead, it] . . . denote[s] the group of rights inhering in the citizen’s relation to the physical thing, as the right to possess, use and dispose of it. . . . The constitutional provision is addressed to every sort of interest the citizen may possess.” Id. , at 377-378 (emphasis added). While neighboring…