Also known as: quiet enjoyment · right to quiet enjoyment · covenant of quiet enjoyment · quiet enjoyment covenant
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A covenant or implied assurance in a deed or lease that the grantee or tenant will enjoy undisturbed possession of the property free from interference by superior claims or the grantor's acts.
Metro Youth Academy conveyed a soccer complex to River City FC by special warranty deed. Local leagues later asserted long-standing field-use rights and refused to vacate. River City sued Metro for breach of the quiet enjoyment covenant. Recovery turned on whether the leagues' claims arose through Metro's own prior grants.
Ryan Roberts leased an apartment above a bar operated by his landlord Robert Rivera. Late-night music and disturbances substantially deprived Roberts of peaceful use for months. Roberts withheld rent and raised constructive eviction. The court found the landlord's failure to control the noise violated the implied covenant of quiet enjoyment.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Renee Rogers rented an apartment from Regal Apparel's building management. Persistent plumbing and heating failures made the unit uninhabitable. Rogers stopped paying rent after repeated repair requests. The court held that breach of the implied warranty of habitability also violated the covenant of quiet enjoyment.
Robert Rivera lived across from an abortion clinic targeted by daily protests organized by Rhea Reynolds. The protests occurred only outside business hours and did not block access. Rivera sought an injunction claiming violation of quiet enjoyment. The court denied relief because the speech occurred on public streets without physical intrusion.
Rajesh Rao leased commercial space from Reliance Insurance. At commencement another tenant still occupied the premises under a prior lease. Rao refused to pay rent and sought termination. The court ruled the landlord breached the covenant of quiet enjoyment by failing to deliver exclusive possession.
Raphael Rivera leased warehouse space from Rhapsody Entertainment. Recurrent flooding from defective drainage repeatedly halted operations. Rivera gave notice and vacated after the landlord refused repairs. The court held the flooding constituted a breach of the implied covenant of quiet enjoyment supporting constructive eviction.
No. A special warranty deed protects only against claims arising by, through, or under the grantor. Claims from prior owners fall outside its scope and do not support recovery for breach of the quiet enjoyment covenant.
Landlord acts or omissions that substantially interfere with the tenant's permissible use for a significant time breach the covenant. Repeated unauthorized entries or failures to control conditions under the landlord's control support a claim even without actual eviction.
Yes. Future covenants such as quiet enjoyment and warranty run with the land. A later grantee disturbed by a superior claim may sue the original grantor for breach.
No. Substantial interference that forces the tenant to vacate satisfies constructive eviction. Courts recognize that persistent disturbances or failures to deliver possession breach the covenant without literal expulsion.
…therein. [^maj-37]: Ingalls v. Hobbs , 156 Mass. 348, 31 N.E. 286 (1892). [^maj-38]: The cases developing the doctrines of “quiet enjoyment” and “constructive eviction” are the most important. See 2 R. Powell, supra Note 10, ¶ 225 [3]. See also Gladden v. Walker & Dunlop , 83 U.S.App.D.C. 224, 168 F.2d 321 (1948) (landlord…