Also known as: reasonably pertinent to
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A standard used to assess whether a statement qualifies for the hearsay exception covering statements made for medical diagnosis or treatment. The standard requires that the content of the statement be of a type a medical provider would reasonably rely on when evaluating symptoms, their cause, or an appropriate course of care.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Roland Rhodes arrived at the emergency room after severe vomiting following a banquet. He told the gastroenterologist that the caterer had served leftover shrimp from the prior weekend. The physician used that detail to identify the likely pathogen and select testing and treatment. The court admitted the statement because the timing and source of the food were reasonably pertinent to diagnosis.
A young patient arrived at the clinic with unexplained injuries. She told the treating physician that her stepfather had caused the bruises during an argument at home. The physician relied on the identity of the perpetrator to assess safety risks and recommend removal from the home. The court held the identification reasonably pertinent to diagnosis and treatment and admitted the statement.
A statement assigning fault satisfies the standard only when the identity or conduct of the third party supplies information a physician would use to diagnose or treat the injury, such as assessing recurrence risk or safety measures. Pure blame narratives that add no medical value fall outside the exception even if spoken to a doctor.
Supporting sources
The standard looks to whether a reasonable physician would find the information helpful, not whether the particular physician in fact used every detail. Actual reliance strengthens the showing but is not required when the content fits the type of information doctors routinely consider in diagnosis or treatment planning.
Supporting sources
The reasonably pertinent test focuses on the declarant's purpose of obtaining medical care and the medical utility of the content. Present sense impression instead requires the statement to describe an event while the declarant is perceiving it or immediately afterward, without regard to medical context.
Supporting sources
Statements describing when and how symptoms began are routinely admitted because they help the physician determine the likely cause, progression, and appropriate tests or treatment. Temporal details tied to a triggering event meet the test when offered to a treating provider.
Supporting sources