Also known as: quarrels
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A dispute or heated argument between parties.
Quinn Quezada and Quest Quail argued heatedly over a shared boundary fence. When Quest advanced with a raised tool, Quinn used force to repel the advance. The court evaluated whether the intended harm met the threshold for serious bodily harm under the governing standard.
Queenie Quick quarreled with local officials after a coastal zoning rule barred all development on her oceanfront parcel. She claimed the restriction eliminated all economic value. The dispute centered on whether the regulation effected a total taking of her property interest.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Quade Quimby quarreled publicly with a private citizen and published statements questioning the citizen's integrity. The citizen sued for defamation. The court assessed whether the statements met the actual malice standard applicable to the speaker's status.
Quinlan Quick quarreled with state regulators after a spousal notification requirement blocked her access to an abortion procedure. She challenged the rule as an undue burden. The litigation tested whether the provision imposed an unconstitutional obstacle on the right to choose.
Queen Quintero quarreled with state authorities after a statute criminalized the use of contraceptives by married couples. She sought to enjoin enforcement. The court examined whether the law violated a fundamental right to privacy in marital decisions.
Directors of Quinn Industries quarreled over whether to approve a cash-out merger at a fixed price. One director alone signed the merger agreement without full board deliberation. The shareholders later challenged the decision as uninformed under the business judgment rule.
A quarrel between the testator and a beneficiary can supply circumstantial evidence of intent to revoke when paired with a physical act such as burning or tearing the instrument. The close timing between the dispute and the act strengthens the inference that the testator acted with the purpose of revoking the gift. Courts still require both the physical act and the specific intent. The quarrel alone does not revoke the document.
Yes. When a testator quarrels with a beneficiary and then revokes a gift while also operating under a mistaken assumption of law, the quarrel may show an independent reason for the revocation. If the evidence establishes that the testator would have revoked regardless of the legal error, the presumption of dependent relative revocation is rebutted and the revocation stands.
No. When record title stands in one partner's name without any partnership indication, that partner can convey good title by signing alone. The other partners' quarrel with the conveying partner is an internal matter that does not cloud the purchaser's title.
…Court recoiled after the 1930's, and which had been I thought totally discredited until now. Apparently my Brethren have less quarrel with state economic regulations than former Justices of their persuasion had. But any limitation upon their using the natural law due process philosophy to strike down any state law,…