Also known as: Q&A · Q and A · question-and-answer · question and answer · deposition Q&A
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A method of making an offer of proof in which counsel examines a witness question by question outside the jury's presence so the court can create a clear record of excluded evidence.
Maria Lopez's witness is about to describe internal audit findings when the judge sustains the city's objection. The judge directs Lopez's counsel to conduct a question-and-answer examination of the witness at sidebar so the substance of the excluded testimony enters the record without reaching the jury. Counsel proceeds by asking the witness a series of targeted questions that reveal the audit details.
During a joint trial the court excludes portions of a codefendant's statement that name the defendant. Defense counsel asks the court to permit a question-and-answer proffer of the excluded language so the appellate record shows exactly what the jury never heard. The judge grants the request and counsel questions the officer about the omitted references.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
In a shareholder suit over a corporate merger the court bars an expert from describing certain valuation models. Plaintiff's counsel requests permission to make a question-and-answer offer of proof with the expert outside the jury's hearing. The judge allows the structured examination so the precise content of the excluded models appears in the record.
The prosecution seeks to introduce a defendant's prior inconsistent statements for impeachment. Defense counsel objects and the court excludes the statements. Counsel then requests a question-and-answer proffer of the statements so the record reflects their content for any later review. The judge directs the examination to proceed outside the jury's presence.
A taxpayer attempts to introduce evidence of payments made to a religious organization. The court sustains an objection that the payments are not deductible. Counsel asks to make a question-and-answer offer of proof detailing the nature of the services received so the appellate record captures the excluded facts. The judge grants the request.
A school district objects to testimony about a coach's post-game prayers. The court excludes the evidence and counsel requests a question-and-answer offer of proof to preserve the issue. The judge permits the structured examination at sidebar so the precise content of the excluded statements enters the record without reaching the jury.
Yes. The rules expressly authorize the court to direct that an offer of proof be made in question-and-answer form. This format allows the proponent to create a clear record of the excluded evidence while keeping inadmissible material from the jury.
Supporting sources
The format produces a precise, witness-specific record of what the excluded testimony would have been. That record enables an appellate court to determine whether the exclusion affected a substantial right.
Supporting sources
No. The trial judge controls the mode and order of proof and may require the question-and-answer format even if counsel prefers a narrative summary.
Supporting sources
Counsel must make an offer of proof that reveals the substance of the excluded evidence unless the substance is already apparent from the context. A vague description such as calling a document the donor's clarification is insufficient.
Supporting sources
…114 U. S. App. D. C. 305, 315 F. 2d 241 (1962). Dissenting opinions Dissenting — Justice Brennan It is conceded that the question-and-answer statement used to impeach petitioner’s direct testimony was, under Miranda v. Arizona , 384 U. S. 436 (1966), constitutionally inadmissible as part of the State’s direct case against…