Also known as: provenances · chain of title · origin
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A documented record of an object's ownership history used to establish authenticity and trace title. It functions like a chain of title by requiring an unbroken path from the original creator or grantor to the current holder.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Pierce Patterson contracted to purchase a painting from Preston Pratt. Before closing, Patterson examined the documented chain of prior sales and transfers. Because an unreleased lien appeared in the ownership record, Patterson refused to close and sought rescission.
Patrick Phan presided over a dispute involving a disputed sculpture. Phan reviewed the ownership records presented by the parties. Phan then required counsel to avoid any statements suggesting bias based on the parties' national origin.
Philip Powell represented a gallery in an authenticity dispute. Powell knowingly made statements linking the work's disputed ownership history to the seller's ethnicity. The disciplinary authority charged Powell with harassment in the practice of law.
Paul Peterson bought land from Portia Price after searching only the recorded deeds in his direct chain. An easement granted by a prior common owner to a stranger never appeared in Peterson's chain. Peterson took free of the easement under the chain of title doctrine.
Pioneer Energy agreed to convey property to Progressive Healthcare. A break in the recorded ownership history prevented clear title. When Pioneer Energy could not cure the gap by closing, Progressive Healthcare rescinded the contract.
Prime Logistics litigated a title dispute before Prosperity Investments. The judge instructed counsel to refrain from statements manifesting bias based on the parties' socioeconomic status during arguments over ownership records. The instruction preserved fairness in the proceeding.
Provenance supplies the documented ownership history that a prudent purchaser reviews. Gaps or defects in that history can render title unmarketable and allow the buyer to rescind.
Supporting sources
Questions arise about authenticity. The buyer may treat title as unmarketable and refuse to close or seek damages.
Supporting sources
Yes. Both require review of successive recorded transfers to confirm an unbroken path from the original source to the present holder.
Supporting sources
…Civil Rights Act of 1964 makes it unlawful to discriminate "because of [an] individual's race, color, religion, sex, or national origin," 42 U. S. C. § 2000e-2(a)(1), and the regulations covering hostile workplace claims forbid "sexual harassment," which includes "[u]nwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, and…