Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A legal relationship between parties who hold successive or simultaneous interests in the same estate in land. This relationship permits covenants that touch and concern the land to bind successors when the transfer creates or preserves the connection between the enforcing party and the party subject to the burden.
Sources & Authorities· 16 sources
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Restatements
Casebooks
Hornbooks
Course Outlines
Study Supplements
Dictionaries
How it applies
Common Examples
4
Original Tenant Remains Liable After Assignment
Perry Pratt leased commercial space from Phoebe Park and promised in the lease to maintain specialized ventilation systems. Perry assigned the entire leasehold to Pierre Poulin. Phoebe never released Perry from the promise. Because the assignment did not terminate Perry's privity of estate with Phoebe, Perry remains obligated to perform the maintenance covenant.
Assignee Bound by Running Covenant
Priya Prasad leased laboratory space from Pacific Bank under a lease requiring maintenance of containment systems. Priya assigned the lease to Phuong Pham. The assignment placed Phuong in privity of estate with Pacific Bank. Because the maintenance promise touches and concerns the leasehold and was intended to run, Phuong must perform the covenant while in possession.
Landlord Covenant Runs to New Owner
Pulse Media leased office space from Precision Tools under a lease in which Precision Tools promised to maintain rooftop terraces. Precision Tools sold the building to Prime Logistics subject to the lease. The sale brought Prime Logistics into privity of estate with Pulse Media. The terrace promise therefore binds Prime Logistics as the new owner.
Tacking Requires Privity Between Possessors
Patricia Patel adversely possessed a strip of land for seven years and then conveyed her possessory interest by deed to Patricia's neighbor. The neighbor continued possession for the remaining statutory period. Because the deed created privity of estate between the successive possessors, the periods may be tacked to establish title by adverse possession.
Howard v. Kunto2 Wash. App. 348, 469 P.2d 990
Common questions
Frequently Asked
4
How does privity of estate differ from privity of contract in a lease assignment?+
Privity of estate arises from shared interests in the leased property and ends when the tenant assigns the entire estate. Privity of contract arises from the original lease agreement and survives assignment unless the landlord releases the original tenant. An assignee in privity of estate becomes liable for covenants that touch and concern the land, while the original tenant remains liable on the contract.
When does an assignee enter privity of estate with the landlord?+
An assignee enters privity of estate with the landlord upon receiving the tenant's entire remaining leasehold interest. This connection allows lease covenants that touch and concern the land and were intended to run to bind the assignee. A sublessee does not enter privity of estate with the landlord because the sublessee receives less than the full estate.
Does privity of estate allow a landlord's covenant to bind a successor landlord?+
Yes. When a landlord transfers the reversion, the transferee comes into privity of estate with the tenant. Express landlord covenants that touch and concern the leased premises and were intended to run therefore bind the new owner. The original landlord remains liable on privity of contract unless released.
Is privity of estate required for tacking in adverse possession?+
Yes. Successive adverse possessors may tack their periods only when they are in privity of estate, typically supplied by a deed or other transfer of possession. Without that connection, the periods cannot be combined to meet the statutory requirement.
privity
of contract between them still remains and is unaffected. Neither the
privity of estate
or contract between the lessor and…
privity of estate
between the party enforcing the covenant and the party against whom the covenant is being enforced, and (3) the original covenanting parties intended the benefits and the burdens of the…
privity of estate
” between the promisee or party claiming the benefit of the covenant and the right to enforce it, and the promisor or party who rests under the burden of the covenant. (Clark on Covenants…
Real PropertyOwnership of real property · Landlord-tenant lawUBEFoundational