Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey
/PLAN-d PAR-uhnt-hood of SOUTH-ee-stern PEN-sil-VAY-nee-uh v. KAY-see/
Also known as:Planned Parenthood v. Casey · Casey · Casey (1992)
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A 1992 Supreme Court decision that reaffirmed the essential holding of Roe v. Wade while replacing the trimester framework with an undue burden standard for evaluating state abortion regulations.
Sources & Authorities· 2 primary sources
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Cases
Statutes
Hornbooks
How it applies
Common Examples
2
State Enacts Pre-Viability Ban
Pilar Pena, a pregnant resident of State A, seeks an abortion at 14 weeks. State A enforces a statute prohibiting the procedure before viability. The federal district court applies the undue burden standard from Casey and strikes down the law.
District Court Venue Dispute
Phoebe Park files a civil action in federal district court challenging a state abortion regulation. The court confirms jurisdiction is proper and evaluates the regulation under the undue burden standard established in Casey.
Common questions
Put it into practice
Test Yourself
10
Practice Questions5
Frequently Asked
2
What standard did Casey establish for abortion regulations?+
Casey replaced the trimester framework with an undue burden standard while reaffirming the core right to pre-viability abortion.
Supporting sources
What is the current status of the Casey decision?+
The decision has been overruled, returning regulatory authority over abortion to the states subject to rational basis review.
Supporting sources
Criminal Law & ProcedureConstitutional protection of accused persons · Fair trial and guilty pleasUBEFoundational