Also known as: pedigree · family history · pedigree exception · family history exception
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
Facts of personal or family history, such as birth, adoption, legitimacy, ancestry, marriage, divorce, death, and relationship by blood, adoption, or marriage. Statements and reputation concerning these facts qualify for specific hearsay exceptions when offered to prove the facts themselves.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Priscilla Parks tells a hospital social worker that her grandfather was born in Ireland in 1892, even though she never met him. When her cousin later contests inheritance rights, the statement is offered to prove the family lineage. The court admits it because the rule allows such declarations about personal or family history regardless of the declarant's personal knowledge.
Paula Pierce offers a church ledger entry stating that her parents married in 1954. The ledger is a regularly kept record of the religious organization. The court admits the entry to establish the marriage date in a probate dispute over whether Paula qualifies as a legitimate heir.
Philip Powell sues for mineral rights as the legitimate son of a deceased rancher. Longtime neighbors testify that the community always regarded Philip as the rancher's only legitimate child. The court admits the testimony because reputation in the community concerning legitimacy and ancestry is a recognized hearsay exception.
Pierce Patterson produces a family Bible listing his adoption by his aunt in 1978. The inscription appears in the family record section. The court admits the entry to prove the adoption relationship in a dispute over survivor benefits.
Portia Price seeks spousal benefits after her partner's death. Former coworkers testify that everyone at the workplace understood Portia and the decedent as divorced years earlier. The court admits the testimony as reputation among associates concerning a fact of family history.
Patrick Phan claims shares in a family business as the founder's biological son. Retail district merchants testify that the local business community always treated Patrick as the founder's only child. The court admits the testimony to establish the ancestry fact under the applicable hearsay exception.
Reputation among a person's family, associates, or community concerning birth, legitimacy, ancestry, marriage, divorce, or similar facts is admissible under a specific hearsay exception. The exception applies because such reputation develops reliably over time even without any single witness having personal knowledge of every link. Courts admit the evidence as substantive proof of the family-history fact itself.
Supporting sources
…as "with the degree of criminal culpability" assessed. 421 U. S., at 698. This concern flows not only from the historical pedigree of the jury and burden rights, but also from the powerful interests those rights serve. The degree of criminal culpability the legislature chooses to associate with particular, factually…
…was open to no doubt under Lord Morley’s Case . Reynolds , supra , at 158–159. If the State’s rule had an historical pedigree in the common law or even in the 1879 decision in Reynolds , one would have expected it to be routinely invoked in murder prosecutions like the one here, in which the victim’s prior…
…it.[^maj-2] Cf. Cooper v. Oklahoma , 517 U. S. 348 (1996) (finding due process violation in a rule having no common-law pedigree whatever, and adopted, very recently, by only four States). See also Martin v. Ohio , 480 U. S. 228, 236 (1987) ("We are aware that all but two of the States . . . have abandoned the…
…that the available portion of the estate could not satisfy the aggregate claims against it. B The cases forming this pedigree
…basis for inference is evidence. Silence is often evidence of the most persuasive character"). And as for history
No. The exception expressly extends to reputation among associates or in the broader community. Neighbors, coworkers, and longtime customers qualify when they describe a settled community understanding about marital status or legitimacy. Limiting the exception to blood relatives would contradict the rule's text.
Supporting sources
Yes. Community reputation that a person was treated as an adopted child rather than merely an employee is admissible under the family-history exception. The rule recognizes that long-standing local understanding often supplies reliable proof when paperwork is incomplete or lost.
Supporting sources
No. A separate exception covers reputation in a community concerning boundaries of land or customs affecting land. The family-history exception applies only to personal status facts such as birth, marriage, and ancestry. Testimony about boundary lines must satisfy the distinct land-boundary rule instead.
Supporting sources