Also known as:misdemeanor manslaughter · misdemeanour-manslaughter · misdemeanour manslaughter · misdemeanor manslaughter rule
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A common-law doctrine under which an unintentional killing that occurs during the commission of a misdemeanor or other nonfelony unlawful act constitutes involuntary manslaughter. The doctrine requires that the misdemeanor be malum in se or, if malum prohibitum, that the death be a foreseeable consequence of the unlawful conduct.
Sources & Authorities
How it applies
Common Examples
4
Prank Chair Pull Causes Fatal Fall
Leo pulled a chair from under Maya at an office party in violation of a misdemeanor prank statute. Maya fell backward, struck her head on the concrete floor, and died from the injury. The death was a direct and foreseeable result of the unlawful act. Leo faces involuntary manslaughter liability under the misdemeanor-manslaughter doctrine.
Chained Exit Traps Worker in Fire
Carla ordered an emergency exit chained shut in knowing violation of a fire safety code treated as a misdemeanor. A later equipment fire filled the area with smoke. Worker Luis could not escape and died of smoke inhalation. The death was a proximate result of the ongoing unlawful act, supporting involuntary manslaughter.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Common Law
Casebooks
Hornbooks
Course Outlines
Study Supplements
Dictionaries
Luis flicked Maya's ear and hooked her ankle in violation of a simple assault statute. Maya stumbled into an irrigation ditch, struck her head, and drowned. The death was a foreseeable consequence of the misdemeanor battery. Luis is liable for involuntary manslaughter under the misdemeanor-manslaughter rule.
Bus Driver Violates Traffic Ordinance
Carla slammed on the brakes and jerked the bus forward in violation of a minor traffic-safety ordinance. Standing passenger Derek fell, struck his head on a pole, and died. The death was a foreseeable result of the non-malum-in-se misdemeanor. Carla faces involuntary manslaughter liability under the majority foreseeability approach.
Common questions
Frequently Asked
4
How does the misdemeanor-manslaughter rule differ from felony murder?+
The misdemeanor-manslaughter rule applies only to nonfelony unlawful acts and yields involuntary manslaughter rather than murder. Felony murder requires a qualifying felony and supplies malice for murder liability. Excerpts confirm that deaths during misdemeanors fall under the unlawful-act theory of involuntary manslaughter.
Supporting sources
Must the underlying misdemeanor be malum in se?+
Most courts require the misdemeanor to be malum in se or, if malum prohibitum, that the death be a foreseeable or natural consequence of the conduct. A minority of courts limit the doctrine to malum in se offenses only.
Supporting sources
Does the death have to be foreseeable under the misdemeanor-manslaughter rule?+
When the misdemeanor is malum prohibitum, most jurisdictions require that the death be a foreseeable or natural consequence of the unlawful act. Foreseeability is assessed from the perspective of a reasonable person at the time of the violation.
Supporting sources
Can an unintentional killing during a regulatory violation support misdemeanor-manslaughter liability?+
Yes, when the violation is treated as a misdemeanor and the death is a proximate and foreseeable result of the unlawful conduct. Courts have applied the rule to fire-code violations and traffic ordinances that proximately cause death.
Supporting sources
47 Cal. 3d 112, 253 Cal. Rptr. 1, 763 P.2d 852 (1988)Criminal Law
…attendance: other remedial care,' namely enemas, compresses, and prayer." The case involved the appeal of a mother convicted of misdemeanor-manslaughter after unsuccessfully treating her child's illness with prayer. Although reversing on unrelated grounds, the Arnold court summarily rejected in dictum the defendant's interpretation of…
Criminal Law & ProcedureHomicide · Unintended killingsUBEFoundational